Propellant-Assisted Perforating in Tight-Gas Reservoirs: Wireline Formation Tests Show Successful Stimulation
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Propellant-Assisted Perforating in Tight-Gas Reservoirs: Wireline Formation Tests Show Successful Stimulation M. W. van Galen; M. W. van Galen Weatherford Canada Partnership Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar D. A Cuthill; D. A Cuthill Weatherford Canada Partnership Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar G. L. Peterson; G. L. Peterson Weatherford Canada Partnership Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar D.. Bouwmeester D.. Bouwmeester TAQA NORTH Ltd Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China, Beijing, China, June 2010. Paper Number: SPE-132002-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/132002-MS Published: June 08 2010 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation van Galen, M. W., Cuthill, D. A, Peterson, G. L., and D.. Bouwmeester. "Propellant-Assisted Perforating in Tight-Gas Reservoirs: Wireline Formation Tests Show Successful Stimulation." Paper presented at the International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China, Beijing, China, June 2010. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/132002-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China Search Advanced Search Abstract Propellant-assisted perforating systems are used to stimulate the near wellbore region and to alleviate the formation compaction damage from the perforating event. This method involves combining a perforating gun with a high pressure, gas generating propellant. Detonation of the perforating gun causes the propellant to deflagrate. The resulting combustion gas enters the newly created perforations. This breaks down the compacted region and extends a fracture network from the perforation tunnels. Wireline formation testing has demonstrated the capability of this perforating method to stimulate beyond the depth of drilling and cementing invasion, especially in tight-gas reservoirs.The wireline formation testing system is often referred to as a mini drillstem test (DST). It is conveyed into the well on wireline and it uses a dual packer assembly to isolate the perforated interval. With the pump-out capability of the tool, multiple drawdown and buildup cycles are performed. Pressure transient analysis (PTA) is applied to the measured pressure data to evaluate near-wellbore reservoir characteristics.Depending on the formation parameters, there are two extreme responses observed in these tests: a radial composite model; or a linear fracture model. The radial composite model represents a higher permeability region in the near-wellbore area, surrounded by a lower permeability outer region representing the formation matrix. The typical radius for the inner region is up to 3 m. The linear fracture model represents a small fracture into the formation, generally with a fracture half-length of 1 to 2 m. In reality often a combination of the two models is more representative. All responses show less resistance to flow in the near-wellbore area, representing a positive cleanup and stimulation. Modeling indicates that the propellant-assisted perforation systems are capable of penetrating beyond any induced damage. This is often not the case when using conventional perforation charges.This study comprehends 50 wireline formation tests in tight-gas reservoirs. These tests are used to demonstrate the successful application of propellant-assisted perforating techniques and to illustrate the different pressure responses created by propellant-assisted perforating in the near-wellbore area. The results are also compared to pre-job propellant stimulation modeling software analysis. Keywords: mobility ratio, radial composite model, tight-ga reservoir, radial distance, infinite-conductivity fracture, wireline formation tester, fracture model, permeability, reservoir, pressure transient analysis Subjects: Formation Evaluation & Management, Perforating, Completion Installation and Operations, Completion Operations Copyright 2010, Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».