Evidence of an Oncogenic Role for Aberrant Tox Activation in Cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL) consists of two main subtypes: mycosis fungoides (MF), which primarily affects the skin; and Sézary syndrome (SS), which is characterized by the presence of circulating malignant Sézary cells. Although defective apoptosis and cell cycle progression have been implicated in CTCL disease development, the precise molecular mechanism underlying these abnormalities is only partially understood. Recently our group showed that TOX, a transcription factor transiently expressed during thymocyte development, was ectopically expressed in the malignant CD4+ T cells in MF skin lesions. Normally in mature CD4+ T cells, TOX is expressed at very low levels. Not only is TOX highly expressed in the infiltrating CD4+ T cells in MF skin lesions, but its expression levels also inversely correlate with the clinical outcome of CTCL patients. However, its involvement in other types of CTCL remains unknown and its biological effects on CTCL pathogenesis have not been explored. In this study, we sought to examine if aberrant TOX expression occurs in SS (a leukemic variant of CTCL), and whether it contributes to CTCL pathogenesis. We found that TOX expression is also enhanced significantly in primary CD4+CD7- cells from SS patients (n=12), and its enhanced transcript levels correlate with higher disease-specific mortality (P=0.039). To investigate the role of TOX in CTCL, we corrected the ectopic TOX expression by lentiviral-shRNA-mediated TOX gene knock-down in CTCL cell lines (Hut78, HH, and SZ4). In all three cell lines, this resulted in markedly increased apoptosis (measured using Annexin V apoptosis assay, 2-3 fold, P<0.05) and reduced cellular proliferation (assessed by BrdU incorporation assay and colony formation in 3D cultures, 1.5-12 fold, P<0.05). In line with these phenotypes, TOX knock-down led to an increase in cleaved caspases (3, 9) and enhanced expression of multiple cell cycle inhibitors (CDKN1B, CDKN1C). Moreover, to test the effect of TOX suppression on the tumor-inducing ability of CTCL cells in vivo, we injected TOX-suppressed cells or control CTCL cells (1x106 per injection site) subcutaneously into NOD-SCID IL2rγ null (NSG) mice and monitored local tumor formation. Control CTCL cells (Hut78, HH) induced local tumor growth in six out of six mice within 2 weeks of injection, with enlargement progressively to 1.5cm in diameter within 4 weeks of injection. In contrast, TOX silencing effectively reduced the tumor volume induced by HH cells (n=6) and abolished the tumor-forming ability of Hut78 cells (n=6). Since TOX is a DNA-binding nuclear protein, we next sought to explore the potential downstream molecular partners of TOX by performing comparative transcriptome analysis between TOX-suppressed cells and control CTCL cells (Hut78, HH). The expression of several tumor suppressor genes, including SMAD3 and FOXO3, was increased upon TOX knock-down in both Hut78 and HH cell lines. Pathway analyses of the differentially-expressed genes uncovered activation of apoptotic pathways and cell cycle arrest processes upon TOX suppression. These findings were validated using quantitative RT-PCR. In conclusion, our results indicate that ectopic expression of TOX in CTCL cells causes the proliferation/apoptosis balance to shift toward proliferation through suppression of the transcription of multiple tumor suppressors. Therefore abolishing TOX activity may be a promising treatment strategy for CTCL. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».