MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4230713894 · doi:10.1108/s2045-794420180000006011

Index

2018· paratext· en· W4230713894 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typeparatext
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiquePublic Policy and Administration Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIndex (typography)Computer scienceWorld Wide Web

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Citation (2018), "Index", From Austerity to Abundance? (Critical Perspectives on International Public Sector Management, Vol. 6), Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 201-206. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2045-794420180000006011 Publisher: Emerald Publishing Limited Copyright © 2019 Emerald Publishing Limited INDEX Acute/chronic morbidity, 76 African American, violence, 16 Alaska Permanent Fund, 45 Alternative globalization movement, 15 American Dream meme, 46–47, 49, 54 Amsterdam neighborhood approach, 167–168 Anti-globalization, 15 ASHA, 81 Association, modes of, 103 Bahrain, 15 Bangladesh, 79 Black Girl Dangerous, 22 Black Lives Matter (BLM), 16, 21, 24 BLM. See Black Lives Matter (BLM) Canada, 17 Car-sharing Südtirol-Alto Adige, 65–66 Cell phones, 78–79 CGR. See Collaborative governance regime (CGR) Change Square, 15 Childbirth, 76 China, 79 Citizens expectation, 173–174 Citizens’ initiatives, 164–166 Civic action, 164–165 CLTs. See Community land trusts (CLTs) Co-creationism, 11 Code Switch, 22 Cold relationships, 172 Collaborative dynamics governance network, 110 indicators of, 109 internal dynamics components, 107 operationalizing the indicators, 107–110 Collaborative governance, 92 definition, 93 Collaborative governance regime (CGR), 92, 93, 95–99 consequential incentives, 96 definition, 95 dynamics, 97 interdependence, 96–97 leadership, 96 logic model, 95–96 reorganized logic model, 98 System Context, 100 uncertainty, 96 Collaborative Participation, 126 Collective capitalism, 46 Common Property meme, 45 Commune enterprises, 25 Community collaboration, 92 Community empowerment, 166 Community engagement, 184 Community land trusts (CLTs), 46 Community researchers, 145–147, 149–151, 153–155 Community values, 93 Consumer Society , 47–48, 49, 54 Coopetition, 11 Coproduction, 143 models of, 125–127 rationales for public participation, 119–125 Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), 40 Creating Public Value , 60 Creative consultation, 152 Creative Destruction meme, 41–42, 49, 53 Creative tools, 147 Cross-sector collaboration, 63 car-sharing, 66 Car-sharing Südtirol-Alto Adige, 65–66 cell phones in maternal health, 76–86 e-governance techniques, 76 Giocosport, 64 INTEGREEN, 66–67 Merano Real-time Bus, 68 and public value co-creation, 70–71 sport in Trento public gardens, 65 Sport nel Parco, 65 structuration theory, 71 SUITCASE (SUstainable, Integrated, and Territorial CAre Services), 67, 68 Crowdfunding, 46 CSR. See Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) DDCMPH. See Department of Disease Control of the Ministry of Public Health of Thailand (DDCMPH) Democratic outcomes, 61 Department of Disease Control of the Ministry of Public Health of Thailand (DDCMPH), 129 Deprived neighborhoods, 165, 167, 172 Disintegration, 13 District budgets, 165 Don’t Trash, Transform , 42, 53 Dutch local governments, 165 Dutch policy-makers, 165 Economic Stimulus Act, 48 E(lectronic) governance, 10 E-governance techniques, 76 Egypt, 15 E-Mamta , 79 Embodied knowing, 11, 19–20 E/m-governance communication tactics, 17, 21–23 Enabling government, 164–166 Encounters with open mind, 186–189 Engage Participatory action research (PAR), 144–147 for young people, 143–144 Ensembling individuality, 11 Environmental crises, 8 Facebook, 21, 79 Facilitative coordination, 11, 24–27 Farmer-to-Farmer Agroecological Movement (MACAC), 19 Farmer-to-Farmer Movement, 18 Fórum Interconselhos (Intercouncil Forum (IF)), 131 Franschesca Ramsey’s YouTube channel (chescaleigh), 22 Frontline workers, 172–173 Gates Foundation, 79 Generic elements, 119 Genetic meaning, 119 Get Talking follow-up evaluation, 152–153 principles, 145–146 SFRS (see Staffordshire Fire & Rescue Service (SFRS)) techniques, 146–147 Get Talking training program, 145 GFC. See Global Financial Crisis (GFC) Giocosport, 64 Global Financial Crisis (GFC), 16 Government-citizen relations Amsterdam neighborhood approach, 167–168 case study and methods, 166 citizens expectation, 173–174 citizens’ initiatives, 164–166 forging, 170–172 frontline workers, 172–173 initiators and initiatives, 168–169 Government’s the Problem meme, 42–44, 49, 53 Greed is Good meme, 40–41, 49, 51, 53 Honesty, 146 IAF. See Industrial Areas Foundation (IAF) ICT. See Information communication technology (ICT) IEN. See Indigenous Environmental Network (IEN) India, 76–85, 79 Indian Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, 84 Indigenous Environmental Network (IEN), 16–17 Indira Gandhi Matrutva Sahyog Yojana (Indira Gandhi Motherhood Support Policy), 81 Industrial Areas Foundation (IAF), 26 Information communication technology (ICT), 21, 78 Initiators and initiatives, 168–169 Instagram, 21 Integral Knowing, 11, 19–23 Integrative actions, 100, 104–105 Integrative collaboration, 11 Integrative governance, 10–12, 94 prefiguring, 12–27 Integrative governance logic model, 100 feedback loops, 105–106 integrative actions, 104–105 integrative group process, 102–104 integrative progress, 105 network situation, 101 total situation, 100 Integrative group process, 100, 102–104 Integrative process, 93, 99 Integrative progress, 100, 105 Integrative typology public participation, 121–125 INTEGREEN, 66–67 Interactive governance, 166, 176 Interactive participation, 125 Intercouncil Forum, Brazil, 133–135 International Land Coalition, 19 International Planning Committee (IPC), 19 Internet, 79 Interpretive research, 187, 194 Invisible Hand meme, 38–40, 49, 51, 53 IPC. See International Planning Committee (IPC) Janani Shishu Suraksha Karayakaram (Mother and Child Protection Policy), 81 Janani Suraksha Yojana (Mother Protection Policy), 81 KHOJ, 81 Laissez-faire, 39 The Laura Flanders Show , 22 La Vía Campesina (LVC), 18 Law Liberates , 44 Libya, 15 Logic models, 94–95 Loops Scoops en Español , 48 LVC. See La Vía Campesina (LVC) MACAC network, 25 MACAC. See Farmer-to-Farmer Agroecological Movement (MACAC) MAMA. See Mobile Alliance for Maternal Action (MAMA) Manifesto of Real Democracy , 22 Manipulative coproduction, 125 Manipulative participation, 122 Mass media, 85 Maternal health, 76 Maternal health, through cell phones analysis, 82–83 challenge, 77–81 federal policies, 81 and health policies in India, 80–81 methods and data, 81–82 m-Governance and m-Health for, 78–80 Maternal morbidity, 76 Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR), 77 Matrutava Anudaan Yojana (Motherhood Support Policy), 81 MCAC. See Movimiento Campesino a Campesino (MCAC) MDG. See Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) Memeplexes, 38 Meme pool, 38 Memes neoliberal, 37–48 pragmatist praxis, 52–54 unsettling the, 48–52 Merano Real-time Bus, 68 Meta coproduction, 61 Meta-governance, 61 Mexico, 16 M(obile) governance, 10, 76 M-health, 76 Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), 77 MMR. See Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR) Mobile Alliance for Maternal Action (MAMA), 79 MOCASE LVC, 24 Movimiento Campesino a Campesino (MCAC), 19 Multicase analysis analysis of participation and, 131–135 background, 128 Brazil Awardee, 131 methodological procedures, 127 Thailand Awardee, 129–131 UN criteria for participation, 128–129 NAFTA. See North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Natural calamities, 8 Neighborhood approach, 167, 168 Neighborhood governance in Amsterdam, 189–194 encounters with open mind, 186–189 in Europe, 183–184 in Netherlands, 184 urban governance, 184 Neighborhood Practice Team (BPT) approach, 190–192 Neoliberal capitalism, 36 Neoliberal memes, 37–48 Network management, 92 Network situation, 100, 101 Nigeria, 76, 79 Nominal participation, 122 North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), 16 One-to-One organizing tactics, 17, 26–27 Open mind encounters, 186–189 Organizational coordination, 92 Organizational membership, 168 Organizational value, 93 P2P (Peer to Peer), 22 PAR. See Participatory action research (PAR) Participation, 146 Participation brokers, 168 Participation typologies, 120–121 Participatory action research (PAR), 144–147 Partnership working, 184 Passive participation, 122 Podcast, 79 Pragmatic administrative praxis, 50–52 Pragmatic cultural praxis, 49–50 Pragmatic Society meme, 47 Pragmatist praxis, 52–54 Prefigurative politics, 14–15 Prefiguring integrative governance evidence of facilitative coordination, 24–27 evidence of integral knowing, 19–23 evidence of radical democracy, 18–19 evidence of stewardship, 17–18 Nascent exemplars of affirmation, 15–17 Preguntando caminamos , 14 Private Property meme, 44–46, 49, 53 Pro-active policy, 165 Pro-growth economy, 8 Protagonism, 18 Protecting the Mother Earth Gatherings, 25 Psychosocial theory, 10–11 Public encounters, 186 Public engagement, 143 Public participation integrative typology, 121–125 participation typologies, 120–121 Public–private partnerships, 36 Public value, 60–62 QTPoC (queer and trans people of color), 22 Radical democracy, 9, 11, 18–19 Relational neighborhood working encounter in Landlust, 192 engaging in encounters with residents, 190–191 into sustainable solutions and restored relationships, 193 Relational process ontology, 11 Relational process philosophy, 186, 188 Responsive networks, 24 Reverent interconnectivity, 11 Sacred immanence, 11 Securitization, 9 Self-interested Participation, 126 Self-organizing confederalism, 11, 19 Self-organizing participation, 127 SFRS. See Staffordshire Fire & Rescue Service (SFRS) Situated knowing, 11, 20 Six cross-sectoral collaboration, 69, 71 Social crises, 8 Social innovation, 184 Social media, 22, 79 Social movement, 16, 17 South Africa, 79 Staffordshire Fire & Rescue Service (SFRS) analysis of findings and strategy development, 151 community researcher perspectives, 153–155 consultations, 149–150 evaluation stage, 151–153 management perspectives, 155–156 partner perspectives, 156–157 training program, 148–149 where theory, 157–158 Stewardship, 11, 17 Structuration theory, 62–63 analysis of case studies, 69–70 case studies, 64–68 framework of, 62 methodology, 63 public sector and, 70–71 SUITCASE (SUstainable, Integrated, and Territorial CAre Services), 67 Sustainability challenge of, 8–10 crisis of, 8 natural calamities, 8 Sustainable Development Goals, 77 Symbolic Participation, 126 Syria, 15 Tahrir Square, 15 TED, 23 Total situation, 100 Trentino/South Tyrol, 60 Trento public gardens, sports, 65 Tunisia, 15 Twitter, 24, 79 UN Criteria, participation, 128–129 UNICEF, 77 United Nation (UN), 128 United Nations Development Program, 81 United Nations’ Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, 41 United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund, 81 United Nations Public Administration Network (UNPAN), 128 United Nations Public Service Award (UNPSA), 127 United Nations Public Service Day (UNPSD), 128 United States, 16, 76 UN. See United Nation (UN) UNORCA, 13 UNPAN. See United Nations Public Administration Network (UNPAN) UNPSA. See United Nations Public Service Award (UNPSA) Exploration of Awardees, 137 participation and coproduction, 135 revision of criteria, 136–137 UNPSD. See United Nations Public Service Day (UNPSD) Village health counselors, 81 Vlogging (video blogging), 22 Vodafone, 79 Warmer cultivation, 166 We All Go Together , 46 Wealth of Nations , 42 Wikipedia, 22 Women’s March, 21 Yemen, 15 Zapatista and Black Lives Matter movements, 17 Zapatista Liberation, 14 Book Chapters Prelims Introduction Are Social Movements Prefiguring Integrative Governance? Unsettling the Memes of Neoliberal Capitalism through Administrative Pragmatism Cross-Sector Collaboration for Public Value Co-Creation: A Critical Analysis Tackling Maternal Health Through Cell Phones: Evaluating a Collaborative Framework Clarifying Collaborative Dynamics in Governance Networks A Typology of Coproduction: Emphasizing Shared Power Get Talking: Managing to Achieve More through Creative Consultation Joining the Citizens: Forging New Collaborations Between Government and Citizens in Deprived Neighborhoods Encounters with an Open Mind: A Relational Grounding for Neighborhood Governance Index

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,303
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,000

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,008
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0060,009
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,001
Communication savante0,0130,009
Science ouverte0,0030,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,6970,680

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,092
Tête enseignante GPT0,475
Écart entre enseignants0,384 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetPublic Policy and Administration ResearchTravaux en français237 207