MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4231114276 · doi:10.5325/pennhistory.83.2.0280

Fortune's Fool: The Life of John Wilkes Booth

2016· article· en· W4231114276 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevuePennsylvania History A Journal of Mid-Atlantic Studies · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueTheater, Performance, and Music History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBrotherGeniusPoliticsPraiseLawBiographyArt historyArtHistorySociologyLiterature

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Terry Alford considers John Wilkes Booth as “one of the most remarkable personalities of his era” (6). Consequently, Fortune's Fool presents an always interesting but often contradictory Booth, part affable gentleman and part moody murderer.Accordingly, the book has several components. One segment describes Booth's theatrical career, another tracks his politics and path to the balcony in Ford's Theater, and the final page-turning portion recounts Booth's frantic escape into southern Maryland and death in a northern Virginia tobacco barn. To put this story together, Alford draws heavily on the memories of Booth's friends and acquaintances, sometimes recalled years after the events.To be sure, Booth could be winsome. The most frequent comment about him was his extraordinary good looks. He never lacked for female companionship. He was also genial, hard-working, down-to-earth, and a good colleague. In public he was quiet, perhaps reserved, but with a healthy sense of humor. His five-foot-eight height was average, but he exercised regularly and was very athletic. Alford says that as an actor Booth was “kissed by genius” (157).Yet Alford describes a darker side to the presidential assassin. Booth was “sinister” (6), “moody and erratic” (98), and closed-minded. Once a temperance man, by the end of the Civil War he drank heavily, though never becoming drunk. He brooded; the imprisonment of Baltimore police chief George P. Kane left him fuming for months. He was temperamental. When his brother-in-law insulted Jefferson Davis, Booth grabbed him by the throat and swung him side to side. Then, as self-control gradually returned, Booth threw his victim back into a chair and, standing over the panting man, warned him to “never, if you value your life, speak in that way” again (137).Appropriate for a conflicted personality, Booth's acting career was meteoric. He quickly became a national figure in the theater, a situation that lasted for three years and earned him a fortune. Then the phenom lost his voice, his career, and his money to chronic throat disease.No surprise that a book about a remarkable personality is filled with remarkable detail. Several examples are as follows:Although Booth's conspiracy team has often been lampooned as a team of buffoons, Alford points out that David Herold was quick-thinking, loyal, and intelligent, and that Louis Powell saw action in the war, played chess, and read medical books.Boston Corbett, the famed sergeant who shot Booth, was highly religious. After the dragnet trapped Booth in the barn, Corbett pestered his superiors for permission to enter the building and confront Booth mano et mano. Denied, Corbett then shot Booth after soldiers set the barn afire. Inspecting his handiwork—a spine-severing, mortal wound to the neck—Corbett exclaimed, “What a God we serve!” (313).Booth attended Abraham Lincoln's second inauguration. A well-known photograph places him on the Capitol portico as Lincoln pleaded for “malice toward none,” but Alford adds that Booth attempted to jump the police line inside the Rotunda and join the dignitaries as they processed to the portico and the ceremonies. Booth was just a few feet from the president, but a brief scuffle with police sent him back into the crowd. Whether Booth would have attempted assassination at this very dramatic moment is pure conjecture because he always intended to survive his crime, but he was also impulsive and the police who dealt with him were convinced that he “meant mischief” (226).Alford wisely steers clear of definitively identifying Booth's motives. To be sure, Booth was a white supremacist and a Confederate sympathizer marooned in the North, which grated on him. Moreover, a promise to his mother not to enlist weighed heavily, and as the war turned desperate for the South, Booth felt guilty for his avoidance of military service. Alford thinks that a decisive moment came as Booth stood with a large crowd outside the White House on April 11, 1865, and listened to Lincoln endorse enfranchisement for black veterans. This, Alford surmises, “snapped the last line holding Booth to the ground” (257) and from that moment the unemployed actor was determined to kill the Great Emancipator.Alford also skillfully addresses the age-old question of conspiracy. On one hand, Booth's ring clearly extended to Confederate sympathizers in southern Maryland. As he spun his plot, which originally was a kidnapping scheme, Booth visited this area, where he met numerous underground Confederates ready to assist.More debatable is Booth's contact with the Confederate government. Not a shred of evidence places Booth in contact with Confederate authorities in Richmond, but more suspect was an October 1864 trip to Montreal, where Booth consorted with the Confederate agents, sympathizers, refugees, and spies. All he said was that this jaunt was “a little business” (189), but Booth met often with Confederate agent George N. Sanders, who told an English journal that he was “plotting atrocities which would make the world shudder” (187). No record exists of Booth's conversations with Sanders. Alford does not believe that Booth spoke with the chief Confederate in Canada, Jacob Thompson, who reportedly controlled a million-dollar treasure chest to further the Southern cause. Nobody observed the two together, and six weeks after the assassination Thompson asserted that he had never met or corresponded with Booth or any of the other conspirators. (Alford might have added that at this point what else could Thompson have said?) This reviewer is deeply suspicious of Booth's visit to Canada—he was not there to polish his French—but Alford has little hard evidence to support involvement by Canadian Confederates.In sum, Fortune's Fool is a very readable, well-researched, balanced biography of a complicated person. Alford's 340 pages of text are probably too much for most undergrads, despite his readability, but his work is prime fodder for lectures and should be read by scholars of the period and those simply looking for an excellent book.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,224
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,072
Tête enseignante GPT0,236
Écart entre enseignants0,164 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle