Notice bibliographique
Résumé
As we approach the 1-year anniversary of the inauguration of the IJMSC's new website (http://ijmsc.org), which has allowed for improved searchability of our content as well as increasing the publication's general visibility, we also celebrate our entrance into social media with the recent launch of a Twitter feed (http://twitter.com/IJMSCtweets) as well as continued discussions on our LinkedIn group. We plan to continue to grow the electronic presence of the journal, thus making it more accessible and more immediate to our diverse group of current readers and potential new readers. In keeping with the theme of making use of new technologies, of the seven articles in this Spring issue of the IJMSC, approximately half promote the use of methods other than the traditional, office-based visit to enhance the care of MS patients.In the most ambitious use of alternative methods of care, Dr. Turner and colleagues at the VA MS Centers of Excellence in both Seattle and Washington, DC, explore the clinical management of MS through home telehealth. In this pilot project, 41 veterans with MS used home telehealth monitors, and their rate of satisfaction with this form of care was high. The authors concluded that telehealth monitoring is a promising mechanism for the management of chronic disease, although substantial practical barriers to its implementation remain. In another article, Dr. Tompkins of Madipen Consulting in Fort Collins, Colorado, and colleagues describe their use of a combination of workshops and teleconferences to promote enhanced relationships among couples living with MS. Their results indicated that the program “Relationship Matters,” developed and sponsored by the National Multiple Sclerosis Society, led to significantly increased relationship satisfaction. The authors also found that alternative modes of program delivery, such as teleconferencing, warrant further exploration. Dr. Finlayson and colleagues at the University of Illinois at Chicago (Dr. Finlayson has since moved to Queen's University in Kingston, Ontario, Canada) also utilized teleconferences to deliver a fatigue self-management education program. Their article in this issue examines whether the presence of one or more of six chronic health conditions moderated the effectiveness of the program.Switching from clinician-provided electronic content to patient-provided data, Dr. Janzen and colleagues at the Canadian Universities of Alberta and Manitoba in Edmonton and Winnipeg, respectively, used information from the North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis (NARCOMS) Registry to assess the stability or lack thereof of MS patients' health-related quality of life (HRQOL) over 5 years. They found that 60% of patients were able to maintain a stable HRQOL over a 5-year period; patients who were most likely to experience deterioration in both physical and mental HRQOL were those with better HRQOL at the beginning of the study period.The use of another type of patient-generated data is addressed by Dr. Larson of the University of Georgia in Athens (now with the University of Oklahoma in Norman) in her analysis of the psychometric properties of the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale. Given the huge impact that the symptom of fatigue has on MS patients, it is critical to understand the properties of this instrument. Also addressing the difficulties of measurement in MS patients are Ms. Toomey and Dr. Coote of the University of Limerick, Ireland. They assess the interrater reliability of two of the most frequently used scales in MS—the 6-Minute Walk test (6MW) and the Berg Balance Scale (BBS)—as well as handheld dynamometry in people with varying levels of disability. They found preliminary evidence that reliability decreases with increasing levels of disability for both the BBS and the 6MW.Last but not least, Ms. Remington and colleagues of the University of Texas Southwestern MS Center in Dallas examine factors that can facilitate medication adherence in MS patients, finding that multiple factors must be considered in the choice of disease-modifying agent for an individual patient. They recommend addressing common reasons for nonadherence to increase patient self-efficacy and enhance communication between patients and health-care providers, and identify useful resources to help support patients.In closing, I invite you to join our digital conversations on LinkedIn and Twitter, as well as those in person at the upcoming annual meeting of the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers (CMSC) in Orlando, Florida, from May 29 to June 1. This will be the fifth cooperative meeting of the CMSC with the Americas Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ACTRIMS). As always, we look forward to an exciting and productive interchange of clinically applicable research from all disciplines needed to provide comprehensive care for our MS patients.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».