Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Exhibition Review Deborah Kennedy Elisabeth Louise Vigée Le Brun (1755–1842): The Portraitist to Marie Antoinette. National Gallery of Canada, Ottawa (10 June 2016 to 11 September 2016). Other tour dates: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York (15 February 2016 to 15 May 2016); and Grand Palais, Paris (23 September 2015 to 11 January 2016). Elisabeth Louise Vigée Le Brun (1755–1842) was one of the most famous artists of the eighteenth century, and in her example we have the story of a woman who was both successful and prolific during her lifetime, not a neglected female talent to be discovered posthumously. Vigée Le Brun is known to have painted over nine hundred works, the majority of them portraits—and portraits of women at that. This major retrospective has a decidedly celebratory tone, marketed with what one imagines was a collective cheer of “at last.” It is unprecedented to have a solo exhibit of a female artist on such a large scale. One cannot overstate the historical significance of the worldwide attention it has brought to a new vision of female agency in the world of the visual arts. Opening in Paris at the Grand Palais in September 2015, and then moving to the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York in February 2016, the exhibition had its final showing at the National Gallery of Canada in Ottawa from June to September 2016. Some 160 paintings were on display in Paris, with around ninety in New York and Ottawa. Many of Vigée Le Brun’s subjects were members of the royal family and nobility in her native country of France, but her fame was widespread, and when she lived in exile during the revolutionary years, she became a portraitist of international scope, with well-heeled clients wherever she lived, from Italy to Russia to Switzerland, with a brief sojourn in England. Portrait art of the eighteenth century was, of course, restricted to individuals and families who could afford it. Members of the rising middle class were having portraits done as well, but it remained a genre for [End Page 117] the privileged. Vigée Le Brun commanded high prices for her work, and like the masterpieces of Gainsborough and Reynolds, hers were not simply likenesses but true works of art. The organizers of the exhibition at the National Gallery of Canada made great efforts to welcome the community, hosting a “Vigée Le Brun Day” on 11 June 2016. This featured not only well-attended tours or lectures by Geneviève Haroche-Bouzinac and two of the co-curators, Joseph Baillio and Paul Lang, but also several hands-on events. These included live model sketching (with all materials supplied), as well as more leisurely sessions that capitalized on the current adult coloring book craze, where visitors could pick up a pencil and color in a page of Vigée Le Brun’s work. Two coloring books of her paintings have been published to coincide with the exhibition (Chêne; Larousse), and this is surely another savvy marketing tool for promoting her work. The exhibition in Ottawa was organized according to the chronological phases in Vigée Le Brun’s career, though the first objects on display were a series of self-portraits and a bust of the artist by sculptor Augustin Pajou. Along with several large gallery rooms, the exhibition included alcoves devoted to a timeline and other contextualizing information. On the way out, for instance, one could stop to view a specially made film about Vigée Le Brun’s life, also available on DVD. Most impressive from an experiential point of view was the exhibition side room called Marie Antoinette’s Boudoir. This beautifully designed room, all in creams and pinks and florals, provided a replica of her bedroom at Versailles, along with a demonstration of the art of getting dressed in the eighteenth century (with audience participation), starting with the chemise and topping things off with a wig and a hat. For all the books on eighteenth-century or Regency era fashion one might own, this was by far the best practical introduction to clothing of the period that one could hope...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle