MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4231198610 · doi:10.2523/89324-ms

Prediction of Critical Foam Velocity for Effective Cuttings Transport in Horizontal Wells

2004· article· en· W4231198610 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Yibing Li, Ergün Kuru

Notice bibliographique

RevueProceedings of SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Conference and Exhibition · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Alberta
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésExhibitionCitationCuttingComputer scienceEngineeringLibrary scienceArchaeologyHorticultureGeographyBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Prediction of Critical Foam Velocity for Effective Cuttings Transport in Horizontal Wells Yibing Li; Yibing Li University of Alberta Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Ergun Kuru Ergun Kuru University of Alberta Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, March 2004. Paper Number: SPE-89324-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/89324-MS Published: March 23 2004 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Li, Yibing, and Ergun Kuru. "Prediction of Critical Foam Velocity for Effective Cuttings Transport in Horizontal Wells." Paper presented at the SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, March 2004. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/89324-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE/ICoTA Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition Search Advanced Search AbstractA mathematical model and a numerical analysis of the cuttings transport with foam in horizontal wells have been presented earlier. The model has been incorporated into a computer program and used for finding a closed form critical foam velocity (CFV) correlation.The new CFV correlation can be used to predict minimum foam flow rate required to remove, or prevent the formation of stationary cuttings beds on the low-side of the highly deviated and horizontal wells.Effects of key drilling parameters (i.e. drilling rate, annular geometry, foam quality, bottomhole pressure and temperature) on the critical foam velocity have also been investigated.Numerical examples are presented to illustrate how the CFV correlation can be used to determine required gas and liquid flow rates at the downhole conditions.IntroductionWhen planning or drilling highly deviated or horizontal wells, one of the key parameters which must be determined is the minimum drilling fluid velocity required to transport drilled cuttings up to surface and the keep hole clean. This minimum fluid velocity is called the "critical fluid velocity" (CFV).If insufficient flow rate is used, cuttings will deposit on the low side of the wellbore and form a large stationary bed which result in severe drilling problems such as high drag and torque, hole packing-off and stuck pipe. It is, therefore, crucial to know the CFV when planning and drilling a deviated well so that the adequate and economical drilling equipment can be selected and optimum parameters determined.Examples of critical fluid velocity (or critical flow rate) correlations for drilling with conventional (incompressible) drilling fluids have been presented by Luo et al.1, and Larsen et al.2Optimization of hole cleaning in horizontal wells becomes even more complex when compressible fluids such as foam and aerated mud are used as drilling fluids.Foam is favorably used as a drilling fluid in many horizontal wells because of its low density, superior cuttings transport ability and stable flow characteristics with low tendency of slug formation.3–6Good cuttings transport ability of foam has been demonstrated in the field6, although formation of stationary cuttings beds has been reported by some experimental studies.7–9In this study, a critical foam velocity (CFV) correlation has been developed by using the Li and Kuru10 model presented earlier. The effects of foam quality, borehole size, horizontal well length, bottomhole pressure (BHP), and temperature on the CFV have been analyzed and the results are presented in this paper.Mathematical Model of Cuttings Transport with Foam in Horizontal WellsRecently, Li and Kuru10 developed the transient multiphase flow model of cuttings transport with foam in horizontal wells. The brief description of the model is given in the following section.Model DescriptionThe conservation of mass relationships for foam fluid and solid phases are given by equations (1) and (2) respectively.Equations 1 and 2In equations (1) and (2), ?sf and ?ss represent the rates of change of mass of foam and solid particles per unit volume of the wellbore due to the mass transfer between layers, and sf denotes mass influx rates of water, oil and gas from the reservoir per unit volume of the wellbore. Keywords: upstream oil & gas, correlation coefficient, equation, flow rate, wellbore integrity, artificial intelligence, foam quality, coefficient, spe 89324, correction factor Subjects: Wellbore Design, Drilling Operations, Wellbore integrity, Directional drilling This content is only available via PDF. 2004. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,037
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,695

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,219
Écart entre enseignants0,208 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2004
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueProceedings of SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Conference and ExhibitionMême sujetHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisTravaux en français237 207