Collaboration between Corporations, Non-Governmental Organizations, and Indigenous Communities: The Bridge Strategy to Pursue Sustainable Development in the Oil & Gas Industry in Latin America
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Collaboration between Corporations, Non-Governmental Organizations, and Indigenous Communities: The Bridge Strategy to Pursue Sustainable Development in the Oil & Gas Industry in Latin America Percy Garcia; Percy Garcia U. of Calgary Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Harrie Vredenburg Harrie Vredenburg U. of Calgary Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition in Mexico, Villahermosa, Mexico, February 2002. Paper Number: SPE-74412-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/74412-MS Published: February 10 2002 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Garcia, Percy, and Harrie Vredenburg. "Collaboration between Corporations, Non-Governmental Organizations, and Indigenous Communities: The Bridge Strategy to Pursue Sustainable Development in the Oil & Gas Industry in Latin America." Paper presented at the SPE International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition in Mexico, Villahermosa, Mexico, February 2002. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/74412-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE International Oil Conference and Exhibition in Mexico Search Advanced Search AbstractCorporations investing in Latin America are facing problems including opposition from indigenous communities and environmental non-governmental organizations (ENGOs)1, and the activities of guerrillas and drug cartels2 that are making it difficult for them to operate. Collaborative alliances are seen as a strategy that organizations can use to deal with the turbulence and complexity of their environments3. Strategic bridging has proved to be effective to approach collaboration in sensitive areas of operation. The main conclusions are:the complex environment in which corporations operates in Latin America requires collaboration among all stakeholders to achieve common goals of sustainable development;indigenous communities have the potential to collaborate with MNCs; however, they need certain level of education and training; andNGOs possess the necessary expertise to act as a bridge, their participation is essential to explore opportunities of collaboration between indigenous communities and MNCs.IntroductionA large number of oil and gas corporations operate extensively in Latin America.4 These corporations have been operating in the region causing major environmental degradation and social disturbance problems. As a result, they have been criticized for acting socially and environmentally irresponsibly, for ignoring national borders,5 and for dominating the global agenda at the expense of other societal stakeholders.6 However, the way corporations conduct their businesses internationally have been changing. Companies are approaching different management strategies to operate in sensitive environmental regions such as the incorporation of sustainable development principles within their policies, and the establishment of different ways of collaboration with host countries and local institutions.Also, corporations investing in Latin America are facing problems including opposition from indigenous communities and environmental non-governmental organizations (ENGOs)1, and the activities of guerrillas and drug cartels2 that are making it difficult for them to operate. Collaborative alliances are seen as a strategy that organizations can use to deal with the turbulence and complexity of their environments3. Strategic bridging has proved to be effective to approach collaboration in sensitive areas of operation. Bridging organizations are those able to integrate organizations that may be widely disparate in wealth, power, culture, language, values, interests, and structural characteristics.7 NGOs can play the role of bridge between communities and corporations. Keywords: sustainable development, indigenous community, university, collaboration, complex environment, mnc, alliance, spe 74412, social responsibility and development, collaborative alliance Subjects: Sustainability/Social Responsibility, Professionalism, Training, and Education, Social responsibility and development This content is only available via PDF. 2002. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».