Notice bibliographique
Résumé
We golfBrian grew up a few blocks from a nine-hole golf course in a small city in Ontario, Canada -and spent many an afternoon, evening, and sometimes night (i.e.junior hours) playing rounds, chipping, and putting on greens long-abandoned by those who had completed their rounds.Brian vaguely remembers friends who joked that you should "not lick your golf balls" because they would be coated with the chemicals that were sprayed on the course.Brad played golf in the Ontario suburbs as much as possible too.Golf was and remains a social activity as much as a sporting endeavour -a reason to spend time with family and friends.The site of lush greens and fairways was a sign that winter had thawed.We both grew up enamoured with the pristine courses we saw on television.Brian's parents took him to see the Canadian Open golf tournament at Glen Abbey Golf Club in Oakville, Ontario in the early 1980s, where he saw Jack Nicklaus, Greg Norman and others manoeuvre a golf course that Brian remembers as a utopian landscape -with fairways that looked like putting greens, and putting greens that looked like billiard tables.Brad's memories of golf are tied as much to watching tournaments such as the Masters on TV as they are to experiences actually playing the game.Golf is a game we both grew up with, and one we genuinely enjoy and appreciate.We have golfed together many times.We tell you this at the outset because this book, and the research and arguments that are featured within it, unsettled how we see the game of golf.Specifically, this work raised serious questions for us about golf 's evolving relationship with the environment, and how various stakeholders in golf have responded to pressing environmental concerns.By raising these questions in the pages that follow, we might be seen by some as social scientists (i.e.critics) who don't like and don't 'know' golf.This couldn't be further from the truth.However, as social scientists who are ultimately interested in and concerned with the factors that influence those who make decisions that have important consequences for public health and the health of the world's natural environments we feel obligated to tell the story that emerged from our research into golf 's environmental history -and its environmental present.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».