Notice bibliographique
Résumé
While the flow of refugees and asylum seekers from the Middle East and North Africa continues into Europe unabated, the war of words within their intended destination countries escalates.Practical concerns about the ability of European destinations to manage the large numbers of arrivals are being supplanted by concerns over social cohesion and, especially since the attacks on Paris, security.Public figures and members of the public alike have voiced worries over who is coming, whether they are refugees, economic migrants, or potential terrorists.The term 'refugee' itself has taken on widely differing connotations, invoking deep sympathy from some, scepticism from others, fear from others.It is rarely acknowledged that 'refugee' serves as a label to be attached to individuals, and that this label is not value-neutral.In this first issue of 2016, Bernadette Ludwig asks us to pay more attention to the labelling of persons as refugees, noting that for some the label confers advantages but that others wear it as a burden that they would prefer to shed.Much of this issue is devoted to the different modes of migration to which our authors devote their attention.The flight of refugees and asylum seekers from danger is covered by Ludwig and by Francesco Vecchio who looks at how asylum seekers in Hong Kong take advantage of that city's status as a global city.Living there, even as an undocumented migrant, offers the advantages of global interconnections that support economic activity across borders, resulting in asylum seekers making net contributions to Hong Kong's already vibrant economy.We learn from Kyungran Roh and Romee Lee that being a defector, although potentially a symbol of political advantage for the receiving society, brings with it liabilities in the labour market of South Korea whose modern economy requires skills that few defectors possess.South Korea is urged to take the unique needs of North Korean defectors into account in the services that they provide.Staying in Asia, Rezaul Islam and Stefan Cojocaru help us to understand the contemporary challenges of migrating as a domestic worker, particularly challenges that the ILO's Domestic Workers Convention of 2011 was to guide receiving states through.But the goal of decent work for all domestic workers is yet to be realized owing to uneven adherence to its principles across Asia.Spain, like some other European countries, has experienced a reversal of fortunes, now as a receiving society whereas it previously was a net emigration country.Perhaps better known as a destination for migrants from sub-Saharan Africa, Mar ıa Hierro shows us it has become a major draw for Latin Americans aspiring to a better life in a country that shares their language.The United States, now the world's second largest country after Mexico of those who speak Spanish, attracts large numbers of undocumented Honduran migrants.Jana Sladkova describes the challenges of their journeys as well as of their lives as undocumented migrants in a society increasingly uneasy with their presence.Blessing Uchenna Mberu and Roland Pongou take us to Cameroon to explore the many facets of the highly dynamic migration, both internal and international, in this under-studied country.Timothy Mechlinski offers a theoretical advance in our understanding of migration by looking at the important role of transportation workers in Burkina Faso, Côte d'Ivoire, Mali, and Ghana.Mechlinski, who covered thousands of miles of travel in those countries, brings us a rich account
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,021 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,252 | 0,145 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».