MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4231503129 · doi:10.1002/9783527808465.emc2016.5316

Optical and structural characterization of Copper Indium Sulphide Quantum Dots

2016· other· en· W4231503129 sur OpenAlexaff
Riccardo Marin, Fiorenzo Vetrone, Tamie A. J. Loh, Daniel H. C. Chua, Patrizia Canton

Notice bibliographique

RevueEuropean Microscopy Congress 2016: Proceedings · 2016
Typeother
Langueen
DomaineMaterials Science
ThématiqueQuantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
Établissements canadiensInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCopperHalogenQuantum dotIndiumBand gapChemistryAbsorption (acoustics)Absorption spectroscopyNanoparticleAbsorption edgeAbsorption bandInorganic chemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Materials scienceNanotechnologyOrganic chemistryOptoelectronicsOptics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Copper indium sulfide (CIS) quantum dots (QDs) have been synthesized according to a simple heat up method starting from In(OAc) 3 and three different copper precursors: CuI, CuBr, or CuCl. The obtained nanoparticles (NPS) were characterized for their optical properties, the CIS QDs prepared using different copper(I) salts show different behaviors depending on the nature of the chosen precursor salt. The absorption spectra show a shift of the absorption edge towards longer wavelengths with increasing reaction time. This is in accordance with the quantum confinement effect: bigger nanoparticles display a wider band‐gap. The absorption spectra have been analyzed according to the Tauc interpretation in order to obtain information about the dimension of the nanosized semiconductors. The band gap energy (E g ) decreases with increasing reaction time. From the absorption analyses we observed a difference in the behavior of the nanoparticles synthesized in the presence of different anions. According to the Hofmeister interpretation, the three halogen ions possess different interacting properties with hydrophobic molecules. The charge distribution of the electronic cloud is rather diffuse in heavier halogen ions, the polarizability decreases according to the series I - >Br - >Cl - . The latter ion, having a high surface charge, interact weakly with hydrophobic surfaces. We tried to give an interpretation of the different behavior observed in the presence of different anions in the reaction environment. We can observe that when CuI is used the QDs obtained after 5 min of reaction have a smaller band gap than those obtained with CuBr or CuCl. Prolonging the reaction time the growth of the NPs continues and the absorption can be extended up above 800 nm. When copper salts with smaller counterions are used, this growth seems somehow inhibited. The same trend is confirmed by the photoluminescence analyses. The emission peak shifts upon increasing the reaction time: although not being excitonic in nature, the emission in this kind of QDs is known to be size‐related. The actual emission mechanism is not fully understood, but defect states (mainly copper vacancies) and bound band states have been demonstrated to play a role. For this reason, as the diameter of the quantum dots increases, the emission experiences a bathochromic shift accordingly. We also noted that the emission intensity is dependent upon the copper source used in the synthesis. The sample synthesized from CuI has better optical properties than the ones of the samples synthesized from CuBr or CuCl. The structural characterization has been done by TEM & XPS: for the analyses the NPs were washed using chloroform:methanol (1:1) to precipitate the QDs out from hexanes. From TEM observations, the NPs appear to have a good crystallinity after 2 hours of reaction. The morphology is polygonal, with a crystalline habitus typical of a tetragonal structure, supporting the attribution of the phase to the chalcopyrite polymorph. It is hard to determine the actual size of the NPs in each sample due to the rather irregular shape, from the FFT analysis the sample made starting from CuI shows smaller NPs. The EDX analysis returns the expected elements in the samples, with Cu, In, and S being the most abundant ones. Beside them, iodine and bromine lines can be observed in the spectra of the samples synthesized starting from CuI and CuBr, while no chlorine is detectable in the last sample. These results are in accordance with those coming from XPS analyses. The QDs are copper deficient, which is a characteristic beneficial from the point of view of the optical properties, since it has been demonstrated that the copper vacancies acts as defect levels involved in the electronic transitions responsible for the emission in this type of QDs. Sulfur vacancies are also supposed to give rise to intraband levels related to the emission mechanism. Our samples have a sulfur content slightly below the expected value. We observed the presence of halogen ions in the samples. It is also to be noted that the anion fraction in the sample increases in the order I − >Br − >Cl − . This trend is in accordance with the EDX analyses performed during the TEM observations. One of the mechanism affecting the properties of the QDs is the fact that the anions can be incorporated in the lattice, thus perturbing the chemical surrounding of the ions. The incorporation of higher amount of impurities should be also beneficial in terms of the optical quality of the NPs, according to the defect‐related nature of the emission of these QDs. The identification of the process through which the anions influence the synthesis and the properties of the NPs remains challenging. It is undoubtful that the use of different precursors leads to QDs with diverse properties, and that the trend follows that of the polarizability (Hofmeister series) of the copper counterions.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,355
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,245
Écart entre enseignants0,234 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEuropean Microscopy Congress 2016: ProceedingsMême sujetQuantum Dots Synthesis And PropertiesTravaux en français237 207