MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4231540664 · doi:10.1353/hcy.2020.0055

Marriage and Fatherhood in the Nazi SS by Amy Carney

2020· article· en· W4231540664 sur OpenAlex
Joan L. Clinefelter

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of the history of childhood and youth/˜The œjournal of the history of childhood and youth · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueEuropean history and politics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNazismGender studiesSociologyInterpretation (philosophy)LawPolitical sciencePoliticsPhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Marriage and Fatherhood in the Nazi SS by Amy Carney Joan L. Clinefelter Marriage and Fatherhood in the Nazi SS. By Amy Carney. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018. v + 309 pp. Paper $36.95, cloth $93.00. With Marriage and Fatherhood in the SS, Amy Carney argues that the SS functioned as a family community designed to propagate a racially elite aristocracy destined to lead the Third Reich into the future. In so doing, she makes a valuable contribution to our understanding of the SS and Nazi family politics. Most studies of the SS focus on its organization and the role of its soldiers in the Nazis' devastating war. Carney, however, directs her attention to the family lives of the SS. She demonstrates convincingly that Heinrich Himmler and his men regarded the SS a biologically superior community of husbands, wives, and children. Moreover, unlike most treatments of families in the Nazi era, which concentrate solely on mothers, Carney's work evaluates the role of [End Page 479] fathers within the individual family and the larger SS community. She grounds her interpretation in an impressive array of policies and directives but also goes further, using case studies to illustrate how SS men and their partners both embraced and pushed back against official commands. Carney thus demonstrates that SS members and their superiors entered into a complex dialogue as they worked out just what membership in the SS family community entailed. Carney begins with a detailed analysis of Himmler's 1931 engagement and marriage command. Months before an SS man proposed marriage, he and his prospective bride had to document their racial lineage. Carney situates the command within the context of eugenic principles that predated the Third Reich. By tracing their family genealogy back at least six generations and submitting numerous other documents, the SS man and his fiancée proved their racial qualifications to themselves and to the SS authorities. Those found to be racially compromised with Jewish ancestors or family members suffering from proscribed medical conditions, and those who refused to comply with the command, were dismissed from the SS. Approval, however, represented the couple's entry into the SS family community. Engagement, marriage, and other rituals connected the couple and their offspring to the husband's unit and to the SS community. The SS also offered modest monetary benefits to families with many children, and both marriage and fatherhood helped advance SS men's careers. Fatherhood, argues Carney, became a key function of the SS man and an expression of his loyalty to his Führer and race. Educational materials explained that the battle for the cradle was part and parcel of the SS mission. Men were repeatedly encouraged to produce large families with at least four children. Engagement, marriage, and birth announcements published in SS newspapers served as constant reminders of men's responsibilities to carry their families' lineage into the future. Yet Carney shows that SS fatherhood meant more than simply producing offspring. Fathers were expected to play an active role in the lives of their children. The author provides photographs taken from SS publications to illustrate SS concepts of fatherhood. They showed SS officers happily embracing their children, diapering babies, pushing prams, and feeding infants. Letters home, while at times formulaic, also reflected fathers' genuine love for their wives and children. Each of these individual families, explained SS literature, belonged to the SS family community. Even at the death of an SS man, the community continued to ensure his widow and children would be cared for and remain part of the larger SS family. Despite all of its efforts, however, the SS failed to win the battle of the cradle. Carney ends her work with a nuanced consideration of this failure. As she notes, only a small percentage of SS families had more than one or two [End Page 480] children. By the end of the war, the age of SS men had declined so much that many were too young to even marry. Although Himmler did provide men with leaves timed to their wives' reproductive cycles, to conceive children, and his Lebensborn program offered childless couples the option to adopt, SS couples...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,796
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,806

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0020,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,208
Écart entre enseignants0,187 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle