Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Copyright levies on recording equipment or blank media exist in many countries to compensate copyright holders for the effects of private copying.In 1965, Germany was the first country to introduce a private copying levy on sound and video recording equipment, following two decisions by the German Federal Supreme Court.The German collecting society GEMA had 'asked the Supreme Court to order that producers of recording equipment be obligated, upon delivery of such recording equipment to wholesalers or retailers, to request from the latter that they communicate the identity of the purchasers to the GEMA' (Hugenholtz et al., 2003, p. 11).The court ruled that this would be a violation of privacy in conflict with the German Constitution.Subsequently, a levy was introduced to compensate copyright holders for the supposedly detrimental effects of copyright infringement using tape recorders.In the ensuing decades, many countries followed suit and levies were introduced on a variety of recording or copying devices and blank media.At the present day, most countries within the European Union have copyright levies, as well as the United States, Canada, Russia and several countries in Latin America and Africa.In Asia, Japan is the only country with copyright levies (WIPO, 2012, p. 3).The general idea behind copyright levies is the following.Consumers often make copies for personal use of copyright protected material such as music, films, tv-shows, or books.For instance, they copy a CD to play it in their car or vacation home or to give it to a friend.Or they record a television show to watch it another time.Under strict application of copyright laws, these acts of reproduction would be an infringement.However, strict enforcement in these circumstances would be both too costly and too intrusive vis--vis rights of privacy and freedom of expression.Hence, legislators in many jurisdictions have introduced exceptions, which allow various forms of private copying, provided a levy is paid.This levy aims to compensate copyright holders for harm caused by the reduced sales or licensing opportunities as a result of private copying.Levies are collected by a collecting society or some general office and redistributed amongst copyright holders.This chapter deals with the law and economics of copyright levies.It first discusses the legal framework for private copying, focussing on the European Union, where the bulk of copyright levies are collected.Second, it presents data on the heights of levies and the amount collected in various countries.Third, this chapter analyses the economics of copyright levies.Fourth, it briefly discusses proposals to extend copyright levies to cover unauthorised file sharing over the internet. Legal background in the US and the EUIn the United States, home video recording was ruled to be non-infringing under the fair use doctrine by the Supreme Court in 1984.Eight years later, in 1992, the Audio Home Recording Act (AHRA) was adopted, which imposed a levy on equipment and media primarily designed to make digital copies of music for personal use (Netanel, 2003).Levies are set by the AHRA at 2 or 3% of the price of devices and media, up to a maximum of $ 12 (WIPO, 2012).Since the introduction of the AHRA, however,
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,020 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».