Parallel 12: Hepatitis C: New Agents -Part 1
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Hepatitis C is the commonest cause of hepatocellular cancer (HCC) in the US and the incidence is expected to increase further as the HCV population ages and develops more cirrhosis. Management of HCC is very heterogenous with multiple non-surgical and surgical options. The true cost of care of the HCV patient with HCC is unknown. AIMS: To evaluate the total direct health care costs of different approaches to HCC care in HCV patients in a major referral and transplant center. METH-ODS: 101 patients were randomly selected by computer from a list of all HCC patients with HCV between 2003 and 2013. All patients were biopsy-proven HCC or met UNOS OPTN criteria. Patients were categorized by the primary treatment modality of TACE, Cyberknife radiotherapy, radiofrequency abalation (RFA), chemotherapy or resection. Patients could have multiple treatment modalities and also go on to liver transplant, which is considered as a separate modality for cost determination. The direct cost includes the cost of the procedure, imaging, hospitalizations and all subsequent care of the HCC patient until either death or transplant including cost of HCV treatment and immunosuppression post-transplant. Costs were derived from the Medicare fee schedule abstracted from the HCUP NIS sample 2011. Medication costs used were wholesale acquisition costs (Redbook 2014). RESULTS: 101 patients, 82 male mean age 59years (range 49-82) were included. All had HCV cirrhosis at diagnosis with a median CTP score of 7 ( range 5-11) and a median MELD of 8. Genotype 1 (74%) and genotype 3 (16%) were predominant. 31 patients were HCV treatment nave, 65 treatment failures and 4 had had a prior SVR. Majority of HCC were detected through cross-sectional radiological screening programs. Liver staging using the Barcelona score was A1 20%; A2 18%; A3 16% and A4 27%; B 12% and C 7%. Tumor size was mean 2.8cms with a range from 1 -14cms. Mean follow up was 32 months with a range from 4 -118 and 37 patients have died. Initial primary treatment modalities were RFA 53%; TACE 26%; Cyberknife 10%, resection 8% and chemotherapy 2%. 43 patients went on to liver transplantation. Calculated overall cost of HCC care for this group of patients was $22,030,108 for a mean cost per patient of $218,120. The 43 patients who underwent transplant accounted for $17,025,037 of the overall costs at $395,000 per transplanted patient compared to $5,817,300 for the non transplant patients for a mean cost of $100,299 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmaco-economic studies of HCV treatment need to model real life estimations of true direct cost of HCC care.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».