Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This issue called for papers and articles related to leadership innovations in schools. As I look back on my career, I recall many opportunities to provide leadership not only in schools but also in communities. In each case, there was always an expressed need either presented by existing conditions or through analysis of practices that were not working. Always it was about change and how to improve on what was already happening or not happening in my school environment. I recall that the key driving force behind every venture was what I could do to improve the learning experiences of the students I taught. With each project I learned that vision and creativity were necessary but if the project was to succeed collaboration and cooperation was essential. Over the years I have taken and taught various courses on leadership and the implementation of innovative change strategies. That said, in its simplest terms providing innovative leadership in schools comes down to controlling a variety of factors, far too many to write about in this column. However, I created a little equation for myself (6P's) that has guided every project. Be prepared. With careful Planning (vision and action strategies) a project unfolds as it emerges from infancy to implementation. Cultivate a Principal. Invest energy in an administrator who believes and supports the project (power and funding are important aspects of any project and they can help in this regard.). It is important to understand and accept that effective administrators have the authority and the power to influence decisions. Always collaborate and involve Parents. They are often your key to success and usually your best allies. Involve them in as many ways as possible. Ensure that other Partners (colleagues, students, consultants, media, etc.) are informed, involved and kept in the loop. Keep a high Profile (you need to get your project noticed and accepted). And finally, maintain a Principled approach (ethics, values and adherence to professional practice).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle