Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Citation (2014), "List of Contributors", Inquiry-based Learning for Faculty and Institutional Development: A Conceptual and Practical Resource for Educators (Innovations in Higher Education Teaching and Learning, Vol. 1), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. ix-xii. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055-364120140000001029 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2014 Emerald Group Publishing Limited Michael Barnett Boston College, Boston, MA, USA Patrick Blessinger International HETL Association, New York, NY, USA Costantino Bonomi MUSE – Trento Science Museum, Trento, Italy Gail Bromley Consultant for Heritage and Biodiversity Education, Woking, UK John M. Carfora Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA, USA Carmen Carrion Department of Educational Psychology, Special Education, and Communication Disorders, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA Hannah-Lee Chalk University of Manchester, Manchester, England, UK Tanya Chichekian Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Kisha N. Daniels North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC, USA Dennis J. DeBay Manhattanville College, Purchase, NY, USA Alicia Ory DeNicola Oxford College of Emory University, Oxford, GA, USA Justin Dillon King’s College London, London, England, UK Michelle R. Edgcomb Bradley University, Peoria, IL, USA Andrew Funston Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia Jeffery Galle Oxford College of Emory University, Oxford, GA, USA Cheresa Greene-Clemons North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC, USA Bridgette Gunnels Oxford College of Emory University, Oxford, GA, USA Brenda Harmon Oxford College of Emory University, Oxford, GA, USA Jaimie Hoffman California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, CA, USA Peter J. Hubber Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Suzanne Kapelari Austrian Education Competence Centre, Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria Jill Leafstedt California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, CA, USA David Leat Research Centre for Learning and Teaching, School of Education, Language and Communication Sciences, Newcastle University, UK Nicolette Lee Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia Ellen Litkowski Department of Educational Psychology, Special Education, and Communication Disorders, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA James M. Lucas Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA Kelly D. McConnaughay Bradley University, Peoria, IL, USA Tracy Miller Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, USA Sherri J. Morris Bradley University, Peoria, IL, USA Menaka Munro University of Manchester, Manchester, England, UK Joseph O’Shea Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA Amie K. Patchen Boston College, Boston, MA, USA Beth Pilawski Mount Washington College, MA, New Hampshire, USA Alicia Prowse Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, England, UK R. Martin Reardon East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA Elaine Regan King’s College London, London, England, UK Anna Reid Research Centre for Learning and Teaching, School of Education, Language and Communication Sciences, Newcastle University, UK Maggie Renken Department of Educational Psychology, Special Education, and Communication Disorders, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA Bruce M. Shore Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Paige E. Sindt CEA Study Abroad, Phoenix, AZ, USA Shufang Shi Strause State University of New York at Cortland, Cortland, NY, USA Eric Strauss Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA, USA Roberta (Robin) Sullivan State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA Ulrike Thomas Research Centre for Learning and Teaching, School of Education, Language and Communication Sciences, Newcastle University, UK Cynthia A. Tysick State University of New York at Buffalo, Amherst, NY, USA Cherie van Putten State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, NY, USA Asimina Vergou Botanic Gardens Conservation International, Richmond, England, UK Nathan Whitley-Grassi Empire State College – State University of New York, New York, NY, USA Julia Willison Royal Botanic Gardens, Richmond, England, UK Gina N. Wong Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Diana J. Wong-MingJi Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, MI, USA Latika L. Young Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA Book Chapters Inquiry-Based Learning for Faculty and Institutional Development: A Conceptual and Practical Resource for Educators Innovations in Higher Education Teaching and Learning Inquiry-Based Learning for Faculty and Institutional Development: A Conceptual and Practical Resource for Educators Copyright Page List of Contributors Foreword Innovative Approaches in Teaching and Learning: An Introduction to Inquiry-Based Learning for Faculty and Institutional Development A Theoretical Model of Collaborative Inquiry-Based Group Development Process Strategies for Transforming and Extending Inquiry-Based Teaching and Learning: Placers – A New Model for Transformative Engagement and Educator Collaboration The International Baccalaureate: Contributing to the Use of Inquiry in Higher Education Teaching and Learning Reframing Relationships Between Teachers, Students and Curriculum – The Phenomenon of ‘Hybridisation’ in IBL Ways of Inquiry: The Distinctiveness of the Oxford College General Education Program Targeting Students’ Epistemologies: Instructional and Assessment Challenges to Inquiry-Based Science Education Strategies for Embedding Inquiry-Based Teaching and Learning in Botanic Gardens: Evidence from the Inquire Project Representation Construction: A Directed Inquiry Pedagogy for Science Education The Graduating Project: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry-Based Capstone in Arts Creating an ‘Emporium of Wonder’ at Manchester Museum Engaging Students in Scientific Inquiry: Successes and Challenges of Engaging Non-science Majors in Scientific Inquiry Mighty Negatrons and Collective Knitting: Academic Educators’ Experiences of Collaborative Inquiry-Based Learning How to Scale Inquiry-Based Teaching and Learning through Progressive Faculty Development Inquiry-Based Service Learning in a University-Based Educational Leadership Program: Service Leadership and Internship in a Principal Fellows Program Confident Voices: How Professional Development for Teachers by Teachers Using Video Promotes Inquiry-Based Practice Tools of Engagement Project (TOEP): Online Professional Development through Structured Inquiry and a Virtual Community Lessons from the Field: Using Inquiry-Based Learning for Study Abroad Programming Understanding the Use of Technology for Facilitating Inquiry-Based Learning Supporting Equality of Education through Inquiry-Based Learning About the Authors Author Index Subject Index
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,046 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».