MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4232309358 · doi:10.2523/86710-ms

Seabed Recolonisation: N'Kossa Case

2004· article· en· W4232309358 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
J. Durrieu, Ph. Bouzet

Notice bibliographique

RevueProceedings of SPE International Conference on Health, Safety, and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueMarine and Offshore Engineering Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCitationHaystackSeabedLibrary scienceBusinessComputer scienceWorld Wide WebOceanographyGeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Seabed Recolonisation: N'Kossa Case J. Durrieu; J. Durrieu Total E&P Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Ph. Bouzet Ph. Bouzet Total E&P Congo Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE International Conference on Health, Safety, and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, March 2004. Paper Number: SPE-86710-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/86710-MS Published: March 29 2004 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Durrieu, J., and Ph. Bouzet. "Seabed Recolonisation: N'Kossa Case." Paper presented at the SPE International Conference on Health, Safety, and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, March 2004. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/86710-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE International Conference and Exhibition on Health, Safety, Environment, and Sustainability Search Advanced Search AbstractDuring offshore activities directed at the exploration and production of hydrocarbons, the living conditions of the flora and fauna on the seabed may be disrupted. Drilling operations in particular, during which cuttings are discharged to sea, induce an impact on the benthic populations living in the sediment.The study described in this paper set out to assess directly on site the real impact of the cuttings discharged, the regenerating capacity of the ecosystem and the medium- and long-term recolonisation processes.The physical and chemical parameters used as tracers of the drilling muds were: the barium and hydrocarbon concentrations, and particle size.The paper presents the main results obtained from the monitoring surveys. It discusses the methodology adopted (study of the physico-chemical and biological quality of the sediment, plus evolution of toxicity and bacterial population trends). The study has shown that the relevant parameters for describing benthic macro-fauna are: species richness, abundance and diversity (Shannon index).Where the environment is concerned, the results obtained are a basis for evaluating the kinetics of restoration of the drilling site in time and in space, and provide evidence of the limited impact of the cuttings.IntroductionAbout 2 million tons of cuttings are generated each year by the offshore industry. Although the impact associated with the discharge of drilling cuttings impregnated with fluid has already given rise to numerous study works [1], mainly in respect of the North Sea, further information is needed in the shape of the monitoring data on the cuttings discharged today and on the fate of old cuttings.The environmental impact of these cuttings essentially hinges on the toxicity and biodegradability of the drilling fluids that impregnate the drill cuttings. It also includes the burying effect, which can destroy the indigenous fauna even in absence of any toxicity, and the inputs of organic matter (hydrocarbons), which govern the whole re-colonisation process after the first phase of acute toxicity.We therefore propose to apply the principle of measuring physico-chemical, biological and toxicological parameters to monitor recolonisation of the contaminated sediments.In order to study the way the benthic fauna regenerates and recolonises the seabed after the discharge of cuttings, a project was conducted in 2 phases between 2000 and 2003, targeting different objectives:Phase 1: To draw up an experimental protocol for monitoring recolonisation. Ecotoxicological measurements and tests of biodegradation and lixiviation were carried out to validate and select the most suitable methods for achieving this. We focused on the impact of oily cuttings [2].Phase 2: To assess the real impact of cuttings and the capacity for regeneration of the environment on a real discharge site. This particular study was conducted offshore Africa, under warm sea conditions. The results are later compared to previous studies in temperate and cold seas [3,4,5].DescriptionThe site is located in the Congo on the N'Kossa field, some 60 km off Pointe Noire, under a water depth of 180 m. Discharge, essentially of LTMBF (Low Toxicity Mineral Oil Base Fluid) cuttings, began in November 1993 and ended in April 1999 and generated around 10 000 m3 of cuttings. A baseline study was undertaken after the first step of drilling in 1995, and was followed by 3 monitoring surveys in November 2000, March 2002 and April 2003 (Fig 1). Results for 2003 are not yet available, and consequently only the results for 2000 and 2002 will be discussed. Keywords: toxicity, station 2, organic matter, capitella capitata, upstream oil & gas, evolution, drilling fluids and materials, drilling fluid property, specific richness, physicochemical analysis Subjects: Drilling Fluids and Materials, Drilling fluid selection and formulation (chemistry, properties) This content is only available via PDF. 2004. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Autre devis · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,976
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,441

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,033
Tête enseignante GPT0,244
Écart entre enseignants0,211 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeAutre devis
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueProceedings of SPE International Conference on Health, Safety, and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and ProductionMême sujetMarine and Offshore Engineering StudiesTravaux en français237 207