MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4232611696 · doi:10.7224/1537-2073-13.1.vi

Editorial

2011· editorial· es· W4232611696 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lael A. Stone

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational Journal of MS Care · 2011
Typeeditorial
Languees
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineFamily medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

As those of us in the Northern Hemisphere celebrate the return of spring, it is fitting that we begin this volume of the International Journal of MS Care (IJMSC) with a theme issue on mobility, guest edited by Dr. Francois Bethoux, a physiatrist at the Mellen Center of the Cleveland Clinic, and Dr. Susan Bennett, a physical therapist and researcher on the faculty of the University at Buffalo. Our guest editors have written an introduction to the issue that describes the complexities of helping people with multiple sclerosis (MS) maintain and improve mobility. As they note, many interrelated factors as well as comorbidities need to be addressed, and this is best accomplished using a comprehensive care approach involving members of various specialties, all bringing their skills to bear on the problem. This issue contains two articles directly related to mobility, one on assessment tools and one on the frequency of walking as exercise in MS; two articles on exercise related to improving and maintaining mobility; and finally an article on bone health, which is strongly affected by and critical to mobility.The guest editors, Drs. Bennett and Bethoux, have contributed a review article on the assessment of walking in patients with MS in clinical practice. Among the measurement tools that they studied, the combination of the observed Timed 25-Foot Walk, which is commonly used in neurologic as well as rehabilitation practices, and the less popular patient-reported 12-Item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale seemed to provide the best sense of patient functioning on a day-to-day basis, although other scales are also potentially useful in certain settings. Ms. Weikert, Ms. Dlugonski, Ms. Balantrapu, and Dr. Motl of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign examined what forms of exercise MS patients are actually performing, and found that more patients reported walking as their chosen form of exercise than any other activity.Two other articles address interventions intended to improve mobility and functioning in patients. Drs. Pfalzer and Fry of the University of Michigan–Flint approached increasing mobility by increasing inspiratory muscle functioning. They found that their 10-week program improved standing balance but had difficulty with the use of the Expanded Disability Status Scale as an outcome measure in MS patients with mild disability. Dr. Plow of the Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute reports with Dr. Finlayson on their work done at her institution, the University of Illinois at Chicago, regarding the use of a very popular and widely available game, the Nintendo Wii Fit. Patients, like the rest of the population, are more likely to perform exercise if it is enjoyable, and Drs. Plow and Finlayson show that MS patients can benefit from the use of this device, and hopefully have fun at the same time. Ms. Larson and Dr. White of the University of Georgia, Athens, report on their work on the scaffolding of walking, examining asymmetrical bone density in MS. Their work emphasizes the need for awareness and prevention of osteopenia and osteoporosis, which are very common in the MS population.Also in this issue, we mark the passing of another important neurologist working in the MS field, Hillel Panitch. Dr. Panitch spent much of his career in MS care and research at the University of Maryland, but had moved a decade ago to the University of Vermont. Those readers with attention to detail will note the special banner on our cover marking 10 years of continuous print and online publication of the IJMSC. The founding editor in chief, Dr. Robert Herndon, initially launched the journal in 1999 as an online-only publication. That publishing model was ahead of its time, and the following year the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers (CMSC) began a simultaneous print edition, with the first full volume in print issued in 2001. Lastly, we look forward to seeing you all this June at the CMSC's 25th Annual Meeting in Montreal, where we will enjoy exchanging up-to-date information on how to improve our care for MS patients and their caregivers, as well as experiencing collegial camaraderie and support among the multiple disciplines represented by the CMSC. At the meeting, an announcement will be made of the winner of the Herndon Award for the best article published in the IJMSC in 2010.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche, Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,022
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,011
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,358
Écart entre enseignants0,328 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInternational Journal of MS CareMême sujetMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesTravaux en français237 207