Abstract 202: Outcomes of Region-Wide Cardiac Rehabilitation
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is recommended for patients with cardiovascular disease, however the impact of a region-wide, centrally managed CR model with local non-medical community-based delivery of CR is unknown in a universal health care system setting. Objectives: To determine the impact of a regional 6-month, once per week supervised exercise session CR model on mortality and re-hospitalization compared to a matched control within a regional health care system. Methods: The regional CR service comprised: a standardized regional referral strategy for patients with established cardiac disease including stable heart failure, local (within a 30-minute drive time from place of residence) CR service delivery by trained CR professionals. Patient data that was prospectively entered into a regional CR database for patients referred to CR from 2012 through 2014, was linked to government mandated administrative databases and all-cause mortality and hospitalization rates were compared between patients who were referred to CR vs. a matched cohort who were not. Matching included age, sex, year of referral, socioeconomic status, and cardiac condition at hospital discharge. Mortality and re-hospitalization were assessed at 1-yr post index cardiac event excluding the initial 6-month period to account for immortal time bias. Results: Fewer patients who completed CR compared to matched controls died (14/1,318 or 1.1% vs. 31/1,318 or 2.4%, p=0.011), or were readmitted to hospital (128 or 9.7% vs. 190 or 14.4%, p<0.001). Fewer patients who started but did not complete CR (CR non-completers) died compared to matched controls (10/639 or 1.6% vs. 21/639 or 3.3%, p=0.045), however there was no difference in hospital readmission rates between CR non-completers compared to matched controls (18.0% vs. 14.9%, p=0.13). More patients who were referred to CR but did not enroll in CR, died compared to matched controls (241/3,933 or 6.1% vs. 196/3,933 or 5.0%, p=0.027), or were readmitted to hospital (932 or 23.7% vs. 643 or 16.3%, p<0.001). Conclusions: In a universal health-care system, patients who completed a regionally coordinated, locally delivered, standardized CR program close to home, experienced lower mortality or re-hospitalization rates compared to matched patients not referred to CR. This association was not likely due to a referral bias as patients who were referred to CR but did not enroll in CR faired worse, not better, compared to matched non-CR referred patients. Health care system decision makers (e.g. provincial governments in Canada) should strongly consider funding regional CR strategies.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».