MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4233039130 · doi:10.1353/pgn.2000.0015

Beowulf (review)

2000· article· en· W4233039130 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueParergon · 2000
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueMedieval Literature and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoetryGlossaryPunctuationSubtitleClassicsStyle (visual arts)Title pageLiteratureHistoryOld EnglishArt historyArtPhilosophyLinguistics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviews 169 assured that students will not be frightened off by an overtly feminist polemic. This text should be extremely useful in courses on Western civilization, medieval social history, and women's history, as well as for anyone wanting a well written overview of the world of the medieval peasantry. Kathleen Troup History Department University ofWaikato Beowulf, with relevant shorter texts, ed. Bruce Mitchell and Fred C. Robinson, Oxford, Blackwell, 1998; paper; pp. xii, 318; 1 map, 22 b/ w illustrations; R.R.P. AUS$45.00; ISBN 0631172262. [Distributed in Australia by Allen and Unwin.] This new edition comprises the following sections: One, an introducti covering the manuscript, date and place of composition, language, structure, style, tone, metre, subject matter, and the editors' two personal views of the poem; Two, text, apparatus, and notes; Three, an account of the editorial process; Four, the background, covering genealogies, the Swedish-Geatish wars, archaeology (contributed by Leslie Webster), related Old English poems, and other documents; Five, bibliography and glossary; and Six, an appendix on the punctuation of Old English poetry. The editors' principal objective is to make the poem accessible to a first-time reader with some competence in Old English. The subtitle 'A student edition' would have been added, had it not been pre-empted by George Jack's edition. Conversely, an annotation on R. W. Chambers' Beowulf: An Introduction to the Study of the Poem indicates what the edit are trying to avoid: 'Scholarly, detailed, voluminous. To be used cautiously for reference only by beginners, w h o should avoid becoming bogged down in controversies of secondary importance'. H o w far do Mitchell and Robinson avoid this pitfall? Their presentation undoubtedly includes m u c h detail that will fascinate true devotees but irritate less committed readers. The inclusion of instructions on how to construe is pedagogically sound, yet in practice these instructions need more of a step by step approach, with simpler passages and fewer 170 Reviews ancillary remarks. Throughout, the editors' vast learning provides a valuable role model to the student, yet the emphasis on individual scholars threatens to occlude the broader issues being canvassed. Some prolix drafting could well have been curtailed, starting with the section onfitts. Succinct and effective is the annotation on the text proper, focusing almost exclusively upon key syntactic and text-critical points. The editors cheerfully snip through notorious Gordian knots rather than fill the page with notes and conjectures, after the style of Klaeber or Wrenn. They also quietly (and commendably) ignore a few famous red herrings, such as 'wundini golde' (1382). Unfortunately, 'ealuscerwen' was not so easily side-lined. The approach is empirical and wary of speculation. This laudable determination to take nothing for granted emerges on their title page: '3182 lines of alliterative verse beginning Hwset we gardena in geardagum. Printed often, since Kemble (1833)[,] under the title BEOWULF.' In their choice of 'documents bearing on Beowulf, they eschew excess enthusiasm concerning Grettis saga and 'Bear's Son' analogues, justifiably assailed by Magnus Fjalldal in his recent The Long Arm ofCoincidence. The Frustrated Connecti between Beowulf and Grettis saga (University of Toronto Press, 1998). Kevin Kiernan's hypotheses are likewise circumspectly skirted, although with due recognition of his work on the manuscript. Claims for allegory and other literary-critical hypotheses are left entirely unmentioned. At the same time, the edition embodies valuable new insights, for instance the reading of the puzzling line 31 as 'leof land fruma lange ahte', long had the leader ruled the beloved land'. Some other suggestions, such as the ingenious conjecture *saendep =sn3edep for sendep in line 600, may also find favour, although they are not fully developed in the present volume. The discussion of structure, while performing ritual genuflections to Tolkien, more interestingly invokes a concept of 'barbaric' aesthetic (presumably drawing on observations by John D. Niles). The term, as used here, does however require further explanation if it is not to mislead an uninitiated reader. Leslie Webster contributes a compact and thoughtprovoking review of analogues from material culture, some of them recent finds, while making clear that the text cannot be treated as a mere repository of data. The glossary is very full...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,172
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,997

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1150,004

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,214
Écart entre enseignants0,195 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle