MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4233125049 · doi:10.1176/appi.pn.2015.9a11

Attention-Control Training Reduces PTSD Symptoms

2015· article· en· W4233125049 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nick Zagorski

Notice bibliographique

RevuePsychiatric News · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiquePosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAttentional biasPsychologyAnxietySocial anxietyExposure therapyVigilance (psychology)Posttraumatic stressClinical psychologyPsychiatryPsychotherapistCognitive psychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article Clinical and Research NewsFull AccessAttention-Control Training Reduces PTSD SymptomsNick ZagorskiNick ZagorskiSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:26 Oct 2015https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.pn.2015.9a11AbstractVeterans trained to balance their attention between threatening and neutral stimuli experienced a greater reduction in PTSD symptoms than those trained only to direct attention away from threatening stimuli.People have their own biases in what they pay attention to; it’s why one person might remember someone’s face while another will remember what they were wearing. In patients with anxiety disorders, the attention paid to specific triggers, such as an enclosed space or a large social gathering, can reach undesirable levels. However, a technique known as attention-bias modification, which trains people to shift their attention from threatening stimuli to neutral ones, is emerging as a potential solution.After the results of several clinical trials suggested that attention-bias modification can help to reduce symptoms of anxiety, researchers have started to examine whether the technique might also work for patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).“People with PTSD tend to alternate between moments of threat vigilance and threat avoidance, so bias training will address only part of the problem,” said Amy Badura Brack, Ph.D., a professor of psychology at Creighton University. A better approach might be to focus on the ability to control these fluctuations, she noted.In a new study published in the American Journal of Psychiatry, Brack joined with colleagues in the United States, Canada, and Israel to demonstrate that attention-control training can reduce PTSD symptoms more effectively than attention-bias modification.With attention-bias modification, patients try to locate a probe on a screen after seeing a series of images; the probe appears in a spot held by a neutral image so they spend more time looking at those images. Attention-control training uses visual cues to shift attention to a specific stimulus, but instead of shifting attention away from threat, attention-control training aims to balance attention between threatening and neutral stimuli by alternating where the probe appears.“Basically we are trying to educate veterans to ignore irrelevant information and focus on the task at hand,” Brack told Psychiatric News.Two separate groups of male veterans (52 U.S. military and 46 Israeli Defense Forces) with PTSD were randomized to receive four weeks of either attention-bias modification or attention-control training; both sets of trials employed similar testing protocols, though the Israeli team used neutral and aggressive words instead of faces, and performed sessions once a week instead of twice a week. Both testing approaches did reduce PTSD symptoms in the veterans, as measured by both self-reporting and clinician assessment, but the attention-control training had greater benefits in both study groups. Among U.S. military, for example, clinician-rated PTSD scores dropped from 72 to 56 after attention-bias modification, and from 72 to 44 following attention-control training.“We feel good about the validity of these findings, as we had similar benefits in two independent sets of veterans using two slightly different protocols,” Brack said.“What’s also promising is that none of the participants was taking psychiatry medications or engaged in psychotherapy, which suggests attention-control training could be used as a standalone treatment.”Brack and her team are currently engaged in converting the computer programs into a web deliverable format that patients could access more easily, though she does believe attention-control therapy should be a prescribed treatment and not completely open access.She also noted that it is important to carry out further studies in other groups, particularly women, who may have PTSD as the result of other, non-combat traumatic events to see how well they respond to attention-bias modification and attention-control training.This study was funded by Creighton University, Tel Aviv University, and AtEaseUSA. ■“Effect of Attention Training on Attention Bias Variability and PTSD Symptoms: Randomized Controlled Trials in Israeli and U.S. Combat Veterans” can be accessed here. ISSUES NewArchived

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,055
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,184

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0550,004

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,113
Tête enseignante GPT0,384
Écart entre enseignants0,271 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePsychiatric News→Même sujetPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research→Travaux en français237 207→