MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4233173587 · doi:10.1182/blood-2019-131818

Obinutuzumab Plus Gemcitabine, Dexamethasone and Cisplatin (O-GDP) As Salvage Chemotherapy Prior to Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Aggressive B Cell Lymphoma

2019· article· en· W4233173587 sur OpenAlexaff
Michael D. Jain, Anca Prica, Ryan D. Morin, Vishal Kukreti, Robert Kridel, Rob C. Laister, Meng Li, Christopher Rushton, Miguel Alcaide, Rashmi S. Goswami, Jan Delabie, Jessica Weiss, Tony Panzarella, Michael Crump, David W. Scott, John Kuruvilla

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCAR-T cell therapy research
Établissements canadiensUniversity Health NetworkHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreBC Cancer AgencySimon Fraser UniversityPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineObinutuzumabSalvage therapyInternal medicineRituximabGemcitabineOncologyChemotherapy regimenRegimenAutologous stem-cell transplantationTransplantationChemotherapySurgeryLymphoma

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: CCTG LY.12 defined GDP (gemcitabine, dexamethasone and cisplatin) (GDP) as an effective outpatient salvage chemotherapy regimen in relapsed/refractory (R/R) patients with aggressive lymphomas who are candidates for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) (Crump et al. JCO 2014). Obinutuzumab (O) is an alternative anti-CD20 that may produce responses in rituximab-refractory lymphomas. Head-to-head, O did not improve efficacy compared to R when combined with CHOP as initial therapy (Vitolo JCO 2017). However, salvage therapy differs from initial therapy in that patients have been previously exposed to, and have relapsed after, prior R. We therefore performed a single centre, single arm clinical trial of O-GDP to assess safety and efficacy in R/R aggressive B cell lymphoma as a salvage regimen prior to consolidation with ASCT. Methods: Transplant eligible patients with DLBCL and transformed indolent lymphoma were treated with O-GDP for two cycles, followed by response assessment by CT. Non-progressers received a third cycle of O-GDP for stem cell mobilization and final response assessed by CT-PET prior to ASCT. O was given at 1000 mg weekly during the first cycle of GDP and then on day 1 of cycles 2 and 3. Responses were determined by Lugano criteria using investigator assessment. The primary outcome is ORR by CT imaging after 2 cycles. The pre-specified statistical analysis stated that the trial will be declared positive if the ORR is >60%, negative if the ORR is <40% and indeterminate if in-between. Secondary outcomes included complete metabolic response rate after 3 cycles of O-GDP and the rate of proceeding to ASCT. Exploratory outcomes included measurements of circulating tumor (ct) DNA during protocol therapy, and analysis of individual mutations. Double-hit score and cell of origin assessments were as previously described (Ennishi et al. JCO 2019). Outcomes: 30 patients were enrolled with a median age of 59.5 years (range 30 - 70). 20 patients had DLBCL, 9 had transformed indolent lymphoma (TRIL; all but one patient having transformed follicular lymphoma) and 1 patient had follicular lymphoma grade 3B. IPI at diagnosis was 0-1 (20% of patients), 2 (30%) or 3+ (50%). Dose delays of O during cycle 1 occurred in 10% of patients due to toxicity with delays in cycle 2 or 3 of O-GDP in 30% of patients. 87% of patients had a dose reduction of chemotherapy with 46% of day 8 gemcitabine doses being held or reduced. Grade 3-4 AEs were seen in 87% of patients (grade 3-4 neutropenia: 77% [febrile neutropenia: 13%]; grade 3 anemia: 13%; grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia: 43%). The ORR (CR + PR) by CT imaging after 2 cycles of study therapy was 60% (95% CI 41-77%). The best ORR (by Lugano criteria including PET/CT) after 3 cycles of study therapy was 70% (51-85%; CMR in 33%) of patients. Of all enrolled patients, 67% (47-83%) proceeded to ASCT. With a median follow up 1.3 years for all enrolled patients, the estimated 1 year OS was 76% (62-93%) and PFS was 59% (44-80%). The OS and PFS in transplanted patients at 1 year was 90% (77-100) and 70% (53-93%) respectively with a median follow-up of 1 year. In post hoc subset analysis, de novo DLBCL had a best ORR of 55% while TRIL/FL3B had an ORR of 100%. The presence of the double hit (DHIT) signature and cell of origin (COO) by gene expression was analyzed in 26/30 patients. Best ORR for DHIT positive was 3/4 patients (75%), DHIT negative was 11/16 (69%) and DHIT indeterminate was 5/6 (83%). Best ORR for ABC-type was 7/10 (70%), GCB-type was 9/13 (69%), unclassified was 1/1 (100%) and PMBL was 1/2 (50%). Conclusions: O-GDP is a feasible outpatient salvage regimen that enables ASCT in patients with R/R aggressive B cell lymphoma across histological and molecular subtypes. Higher rates of cytopenias with O-GDP contributed to treatment delays and dose reductions or holds. Further mutational analysis will be presented. The ORR of 60% met the study primary endpoint and the 1 year OS and PFS are encouraging. Disclosures Jain: Kite/Gilead: Consultancy. Prica:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Kukreti:Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Kridel:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Crump:Servier: Consultancy; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy. Scott:Roche/Genentech: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; NanoString: Patents & Royalties: Named inventor on a patent licensed to NanoSting [Institution], Research Funding. Kuruvilla:Abbvie: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Janssen: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Merck: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: Obinutuzumab is an anti-CD20 antibody being tested here in a prospective clinical trial for relapsed/refractory aggressive B cell lymphomas

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,006

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,258
Écart entre enseignants0,247 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetCAR-T cell therapy research→Travaux en français237 207→