MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4233360725 · doi:10.1353/jur.2015.0007

Editor’s Introduction

2015· article· en· W4233360725 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kurt Martens

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œJurist/˜The œjurist · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueTheology and Canon Law Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBishopsCanon lawSynodClassicsAudience measurementArchitectureLawJurisprudenceHistorySociologyTheologyPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Editor’s Introduction Kurt Martens (bio) This first issue for 2015 shows once more the variety of contributions on canonically relevant subjects offered to our readership. Additional jurisprudence of the Apostolic Signatura and a nota explicativa of the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts are valuable resources for canonists. In a first contribution, Duncan G. Stroik, Professor of Architecture at the University of Notre Dame and a well-known practicing architect, explores church architecture since Vatican II. His contribution is the written text of the Eighth Annual Frederick R. McManus Memorial Lecture given at the School of Canon Law of The Catholic University of America on October 30, 2014. The author has a clear view on church architecture, as is demonstrated not only in his article, but also in the various churches he has designed as the lead-architect. As we prepare for the Ordinary General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops on the Family, scheduled for October 2015, John Beal looks at canon 72 of the Council of Trullo (691). The canon threatened with invalidity marriages entered between the orthodox and heretics. Although the authorities of the Eastern Churches had never formally abrogated this canon, it had fallen into desuetude by the time of the disruption of communion between the Churches of the East and West in 1054. As canonists in the 1950’s, especially in the United States, were anxious to find ways to regularize marriages of Catholics with divorced Orthodox communicants, they used the Trullan canon to declare invalid marriages of Orthodox [End Page 1] and Protestants. The argument for the continued validity of the Trullan impediment rested on the claim that since the schism the hierarchs of the Eastern Orthodox Churches have had no jurisdiction to change the law and, since the Roman Pontiff had not abrogated the canon of Trullo, it remained in force. While the approach might have been very useful in pastoral practice, it was at odds with the Vatican II recognition of the authority of Eastern hierarchs to govern their Churches. Catholic jurisprudence finally recognized that canon 72 of Trullo had been abrogated. On August 27, 2014, Pope Francis established a Special Commission of study for the reform of the canonical process in marriage nullity cases. A few months later, in the Final Report of the 2014 Extraordinary Assembly of the Synod of Bishops, reference was made to possible changes in the procedure to deal with the alleged nullity of marriages. Roch Pagé offers some reflections on the proposed reform of the canonical matrimonial process. He is extremely well-placed to do so, because he combines the experience of a professor of procedural law with his current role as judicial vicar of the Canadian Appeal Tribunal. This unique combination of theory and practice—overseeing all the first instance tribunals of Canada—results in very interesting comments. In her contribution, Nancy Bauer focuses on the state of consecrated life. Although canon 207 §2 of the Code of Canon Law asserts that the state of those who are consecrated to God by profession of the evangelical counsels “does not belong to the hierarchical structure of the Church, it nevertheless belongs to its life and holiness.” The canon seems to suggest at the same time that consecrated life does and does not fit into the ecclesial body. The latter part of the statement is repeated in canon 574 §1: “The state of those who profess the evangelical counsels in institutes of this type (i.e., institutes of consecrated life) belongs to the life and holiness of the Church.” The article explores two questions. What does it mean, canonically, that consecrated life is not part of the hierarchical structure of the Church? What does it mean, canonically, that consecrated life belongs to the life and holiness of the Church? Since the sexual abuse crisis broke and the promulgation of the motu proprio Sacramentorum sanctitatis tutela, canon lawyers have become increasingly cognizant of the penal process and have been involved as actors in such penal processes. But before a penal process can be organized, a preliminary investigation is conducted. Much has been written [End Page 2] about the preliminary investigation, but questions remain. One of these questions is...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,037
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,325
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,963

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,037
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,002
Bibliométrie0,0030,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0070,005
Science ouverte0,0040,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0070,007
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,3250,191

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,223
Écart entre enseignants0,204 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revue˜The œJurist/˜The œjuristMême sujetTheology and Canon Law StudiesTravaux en français237 207