World Wide Research: Reshaping the Sciences and Humanities, by William H. Dutton and Paul W. Jeffreys, eds
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The aim of this edited book is to convey the benefits, challenges, opportunities, and risks that enable 21st century science and the humanities to make discoveries that advance scientific knowledge in a new computational world.Its editors and the fifty-four other contributors of this thirty-nine chapter volume set out to help us understand the complex social (institutional) and technical environment of 'e-research', several decades ago labeled 'Big Science' and now known by various names such as 'e-science', 'e-infrastructure', 'cyberinfrastructure', 'grid computing', 'grid-enabled research', 'virtual research environment', 'collaboratories', and 'research-centered computational networks'.Its editors tell us that this volume is a "wide-angle lens snapshot of the evolution of e-research about a decade after this phenomenon first emerged" (p.344), its emergence resulting from funding decisions by government research agency policy makers in the United Kingdom and United States between the latter part of the 1980s and early 21st century.The book is to "serve as a roadmap charted at a particular point in the progress of e-research, with signposts to likely future dynamics and issues" (p.347).This roadmap requires a variety of perspectives, and the sociological and the technological provide the foundations for this book.Its two editors Dutton and Jeffreys represent, respectively, the social scientist and the computer scientist-cum-technologist.Dutton focuses on the non-technological landscape framed as the social shaping of sociotechnical (eco)systems, which argues that consequences and outcomes cannot be predicted in advance.Jeffreys's interests lie principally in constructing the built computational environment that provides the infrastructure for progress in science.Their colleagues, whose thinking is mostly reflected in two or three page essays, are drawn from university, government, and industry and are long-time as well as novice participants in science and technology research and science policy in their home countries, largely the United Kingdom but also Canada, China, Europe, Latin America and the United States.No matter their national origin, however, their assessment of e-research reflects a commitment to the Mertonian norms of 'open science'.This edited volume is a product of their collaborations with the University of Oxford Internet Institute and its e-research initiatives, including the e-Horizon and Oxford e-Social Science conferences in 2006 and 2008.Dutton and Jeffreys introduce the reader to the advanced computational and network capabilities that lead to opportunities and risks to the e-research environment.Part I entitled "Foundations" sets the agenda for the volume.Chapter 1 "Reconfiguring Access in Research: Information, Expertise, and Experience" utilises the social shaping of technology perspective to describe the research environment (Dutton).Three short essays follow that describe the development of cyberinfrastructure (Bowker and colleagues), role of webometrics (Thelwall), and how the distribution of hyperlinks follows a 'power law' (Ackland).Chapter 2 "The Developing Conception of e-Research" describes the origins and growth of grid computing, explains the meaning of e-infrastructure and its social dimensions, and discusses the future of virtual collaborative organisations with a focus on the ease of use of complex technologies and services.Three short essays follow on the construction of a research platform (Hey and colleagues), the evolution in the scale and diversity of participation, content, collaboration, and infrastructure (de Roure), and how Internet technologies and the Web are altering the practices of firms and other organisations (Taylor).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle