MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4233598183 · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32485-1

Neurodevelopmental outcome at 5 years of age after general anaesthesia or awake-regional anaesthesia in infancy (GAS): an international, multicentre, randomised, controlled equivalence trial

2019· article· en· W4233598183 sur OpenAlexafffundabout
Mary Ellen McCann, Jurgen C. de Graaff, Liam Dorris, Nicola Disma, Davinia E. Withington, Graham Bell, Anneke Grobler, Robyn Stargatt, Rod W. Hunt, Suzette J Sheppard, Jacki Marmor, Gaia Giribaldi, David C. Bellinger, Penelope L Hartmann, Pollyanna Hardy, Geoff Frawley, Francesca Izzo, Britta S. von Ungern‐Sternberg, Anne M Lynn, Niall Wilton, Martin Mueller, David M. Polaner, Anthony Absalom, Peter Szmuk, N S Morton, Charles B. Berde, Sulpicio G. Soriano, Andrew Davidson, Sarah Arnup, Katherine J. Lee, Gillian Ormond, Michael Takagi, Kaitlyn Taylor, Stephanie Malarbi, Melissa Doyle, Philip Ragg, David Costi, Graham Knottenbelt, Koto Furue, Hélène Gagnon, Leila Mameli, Alessio Pini Prato, Girolamo Mattioli, Andrea Wolfler, Stefania Maria Bova, Arianna Krachmalnicoff, Claudia Guuva, Desiree BM van der Werff, Jose TDG van Gool, Kim van Loon, Cor J. Kalkman, Anneloes L. van Baar, Frouckje M Hoekstra, Martin Volkers, Martine Oostra, Jaycee Pownall, Jack Waldman, Ruth Hind, Joseph D. Symonds, Oliver Bagshaw, Navil F. Sethna, Pete G. Kovatsis, Joseph P. Cravero, Iskra Ivanova, Agnes I. Hunyady, Shilpa Verma, Joss Thomas, Denisa M. Haret, Jeffrey Steiner, Brian Kravitz, Alan Farrow-Gillespie, Santhanam Suresh, Stephen R. Hays, Andreas H. Taenzer, Lynne G. Maxwell, Robert F. Williams

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Lancet · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineNeuroscience
ThématiqueAnesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
Établissements canadiensMcGill UniversityMontreal Children's Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Health and Medical Research CouncilNational Institutes of HealthStan Perron Charitable FoundationAustralian and New Zealand College of AnaesthetistsNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchPfizerMinistero della SaluteCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchFonds NutsOhraMurdoch Children's Research InstituteChildren's Hospital FoundationPfizer CanadaMedical Research CouncilChildren’s Hospital of Wisconsin Research Institute
Mots-clésMedicineGeneral anaesthesiaRandomized controlled trialPediatricsGestational ageAnesthesiaGeneral anaestheticWechsler Adult Intelligence ScaleWechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of IntelligenceCognitionPsychiatrySurgeryPregnancyWechsler Intelligence Scale for Children

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background In laboratory animals, exposure to most general anaesthetics leads to neurotoxicity manifested by neuronal cell death and abnormal behaviour and cognition. Some large human cohort studies have shown an association between general anaesthesia at a young age and subsequent neurodevelopmental deficits, but these studies are prone to bias. Others have found no evidence for an association. We aimed to establish whether general anaesthesia in early infancy affects neurodevelopmental outcomes. Methods In this international, assessor-masked, equivalence, randomised, controlled trial conducted at 28 hospitals in Australia, Italy, the USA, the UK, Canada, the Netherlands, and New Zealand, we recruited infants of less than 60 weeks' postmenstrual age who were born at more than 26 weeks' gestation and were undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy, without previous exposure to general anaesthesia or risk factors for neurological injury. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by use of a web-based randomisation service to receive either awake-regional anaesthetic or sevoflurane-based general anaesthetic. Anaesthetists were aware of group allocation, but individuals administering the neurodevelopmental assessments were not. Parents were informed of their infants group allocation upon request, but were told to mask this information from assessors. The primary outcome measure was full-scale intelligence quotient (FSIQ) on the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, third edition (WPPSI-III), at 5 years of age. The primary analysis was done on a per-protocol basis, adjusted for gestational age at birth and country, with multiple imputation used to account for missing data. An intention-to-treat analysis was also done. A difference in means of 5 points was predefined as the clinical equivalence margin. This completed trial is registered with ANZCTR, number ACTRN12606000441516, and ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00756600. Findings Between Feb 9, 2007, and Jan 31, 2013, 4023 infants were screened and 722 were randomly allocated: 363 (50%) to the awake-regional anaesthesia group and 359 (50%) to the general anaesthesia group. There were 74 protocol violations in the awake-regional anaesthesia group and two in the general anaesthesia group. Primary outcome data for the per-protocol analysis were obtained from 205 children in the awake-regional anaesthesia group and 242 in the general anaesthesia group. The median duration of general anaesthesia was 54 min (IQR 41–70). The mean FSIQ score was 99·08 (SD 18·35) in the awake-regional anaesthesia group and 98·97 (19·66) in the general anaesthesia group, with a difference in means (awake-regional anaesthesia minus general anaesthesia) of 0·23 (95% CI −2·59 to 3·06), providing strong evidence of equivalence. The results of the intention-to-treat analysis were similar to those of the per-protocol analysis. Interpretation Slightly less than 1 h of general anaesthesia in early infancy does not alter neurodevelopmental outcome at age 5 years compared with awake-regional anaesthesia in a predominantly male study population. Funding US National Institutes of Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Thrasher Research Fund, Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, Health Technologies Assessment–National Institute for Health Research (UK), Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Canadian Anesthesiologists Society, Pfizer Canada, Italian Ministry of Health, Fonds NutsOhra, UK Clinical Research Network, Perth Children's Hospital Foundation, the Stan Perron Charitable Trust, and the Callahan Estate.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,029

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0040,002
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,078
Tête enseignante GPT0,341
Écart entre enseignants0,263 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations732
Publié2019
Routes d'admission3
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe LancetMême sujetAnesthesia and Neurotoxicity ResearchTravaux en français237 207