321 Perceived Value of Knowledge Translation Intervention Designed to Facilitate Burn Survivors’ Work Reintegration
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Returning to work can be a substantial challenge for burn survivors. Approximately 28% never return to any form of employment, resulting in lower health-related quality of life. In other conditions, open communication has been identified as a facilitator for return to work (RTW). A knowledge translation (KT) intervention in the form of an educational video was developed for adult burn survivors to facilitate their RTW and promote communication with co-workers and employers. Following its implementation, the impact on the RTW process needed to be evaluated, thus a mixed methods, cross-sectional study was performed. Burn survivors included in the KT intervention were recruited and compared to a control group (CG). The CG included burn survivors who were admitted prior to the development of the educational video or who did not have an opportunity to review the video due to the timing of their transfer to another facility or rapid discharge. The CG were selectively invited to participate so that the two groups’ mean age, gender and percent total body surface area burned were similar. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to gather information about their RTW process and outcomes. Qualitative data was analyzed through thematic analysis and quantitative data was summarized and compared using Mann-Whitney tests. Overall, both groups were satisfied with their RTW process. Participants from the CG identified more barriers related to support received, particularly at work. More participants from the CG also indicated psychological symptoms and social challenges such as post-traumatic stress disorder, self-consciousness and discomfort with questions as a barrier to RTW. Many participants from the KT group indicated that the video gave them tools to explain and provide others with a better understanding of their lived experience. It is possible that the video facilitated more open communication by empowering burn survivors to explain their situation on their own, thus reducing the prevalence of social and psychological barriers among the KT group by allowing them to self-advocate for more support. The video should continue to be used, however, it should be expanded to provide additional information about RTW facilitators such as progressive RTW, flexible schedules, and task modifications or accommodations.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,013 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».