MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4234097594 · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002057

Inhaled versus systemic corticosteroids for the treatment of chronic lung disease in ventilated very low birth weight preterm infants

2003· review· en· W4234097594 sur OpenAlex
SS Shah, Arne Ohlsson, Henry L. Halliday, VS Shah

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2003
Typereview
Langueen
Domaine
Thématique
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineBronchopulmonary dysplasiaRandomized controlled trialLow birth weightRespiratory distressGestational agePediatricsBirth weightAdverse effectCochrane LibraryPregnancyInternal medicineSurgery

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Chronic lung disease (CLD) remains a serious and common problem among very low birth weight infants despite the use of antenatal steroids and postnatal surfactant therapy to decrease the incidence and severity of respiratory distress syndrome. Corticosteroids have been widely used to treat or prevent CLD due to their anti-inflammatory properties. However, the use of systemic steroids has been associated with serious short and long term adverse effects. Administration of corticosteroids topically through the respiratory tract might result in beneficial effects on the pulmonary system with fewer undesirable systemic side effects. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of inhaled versus systemic corticosteroids administered to ventilator dependent preterm neonates with birth weight </= 1500 grams or gestational age </= 32 weeks after two weeks of life for the treatment of evolving CLD. SEARCH STRATEGY: Randomized and quasi-randomized trials were identified by searching the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2002), MEDLINE (1966 - September 2002), EMBASE (1980 - September 2002), CINAHL (1982 - September 2002), reference lists of published trials and abstracts published in Pediatric Research (1990 - April 2002) from the Society for Pediatric Research/Pediatric Academic Societies' Annual Meetings. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized or quasi-randomized trials comparing inhaled versus systemic corticosteroid therapy (irrespective of the dose and duration of therapy) starting after the first two weeks of life in ventilator dependent very low birth weight preterm neonates. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted regarding clinical outcomes including CLD at 28 days or 36 weeks corrected gestational age (CGA), mortality, combined outcome of death or CLD at 28 days or 36 weeks CGA, other pulmonary outcomes and adverse effects. All data were analyzed using RevMan 4.1. When appropriate, meta-analysis was performed using relative risk (RR), risk difference (RD), and weighted mean difference (WMD) along with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). If RD was statistically significant, number needed to treat (NNT) was calculated. MAIN RESULTS: Five trials comparing inhaled versus systemic corticosteroids in the treatment of CLD were identified. Two trials were excluded as both included non ventilator dependent patients. One trial is awaiting assessment and clarification of published data. Two trials qualified for inclusion in this review. Halliday et al (Halliday 2001a) randomized infants < 72 hours, while Suchomski et al (Suchomski 2002) randomized at 12-21 days. Although the steroids were commenced after the first 2 weeks of life in both the trials, the outcomes were measured over different time periods, from the age at randomization in each trial, making it inappropriate to combine results. In neither trial was there a statistically significant difference between the groups in the incidence of CLD at 36 weeks CGA amongst all randomized infants. The estimates for the trial by Halliday et al (Halliday 2001a) were RR 1.10 (95% CI 0.82, 1.47), RD 0.03 (95% CI -0.08, 0.15); number of infants (n) = 292 and for the trial by Suchomski et al (Suchomski 2002) RR 0.90 (95% CI 0.79, 1.02), RD -0.10 (95% CI -0.22, 0.02; n = 78 ). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in either trial for oxygen dependency at 28 days, death by 28 days or 36 weeks, the combined outcome of death or CLD by 28 days or 36 weeks CGA, duration of intubation, duration of oxygen dependence, or adverse effects. Information on the long term neurodevelopmental outcomes was not available. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: This review found no evidence that inhaled corticosteroids confer net advantages over systemic corticosteroids in the management of ventilator dependent preterm infants. Neither inhaled steroids, nor systemic steroids, can be recommended as standard treatment for ventilated preterm infants. There was no evidence of difference in effectiveness or side-effect profiles for inhaled versus systemic steroids. A better delivery system guaranteeing selective delivery of inhaled steroids to the alveoli might result in beneficial clinical effects without increasing side-effects. To resolve this issue, studies are needed to identify the risk/benefit ratio of different delivery techniques and dosing schedules for the administration of these medications. The long term effects of inhaled steroids, with particular attention to neurodevelopmental outcome, should be addressed in future studies.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,008
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Revue systématique · Signal consensuel: Revue systématique
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,063
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0080,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0140,003
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0020,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,088
Tête enseignante GPT0,371
Écart entre enseignants0,283 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

En bref

Citations27
Publié2003
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Cochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsTravaux en français237 207