Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Objective: To evaluate the use of the known implantation data algorithm KIDscore TM D5 (Vitrolife , Canad) as an additional tool to morphologic assessment and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) to improve implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates. Methods: Design: Retrospective Cohort Study. A total of 912 embryos from 270 patients that underwent an IVF treatment at INMATER Fertility Clinic in Lima -Per, between October 2016 and June 2018, were analyzed. All embryos were cultured for up to 5 or 6 days in the Embryoscope time-lapse incubator (Vitrolife , Canada) and evaluated using the KIDscore TM D5 algorithm (KS5). 778 (85.31%) of these embryos were also biopsied for PGT-A screening. A total of 184 single embryo transfers (68% of patients), were performed during this period and the embryos transferred were classified into four groups: 1) Euploid embryos transferred without considering their KS5 score in the selection process (n=86), 2) Euploid embryos transferred considering their KS5 score in the selection process (n=48), 3) Embryos transferred without considering their KS5 score in the selection process and that were not evaluated by PGT-A (n=40) and 4) Embryos transferred considering their KS5 score in the selection process and that were not evaluated by PGT-A (n=10). Implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates were compared between the groups and between euploid embryos with the highest/ best KS5 score (KS5=6, n=25) and euploid embryos with the lowest/worst KS5 score (KS5=1, n=51). Correlation between KS5 score and embryo euploidy rate was also evaluated. Results: Implantation rate and ongoing pregnancy rates was found to be significantly higher in euploid embryo transfers when taking into account their KS5 score in the embryo selection process compared to euploid embryo transfers where selection was based on morphology (75.00% vs. 50.00%; p=0.002 and 66.66% vs 48.83%; p=0.037 respectively). Additionally, implantation rates were significantly higher for blastocysts with highest KS5 score (KS5=6) compared to lowest (KS5=1) (80.00% vs. 49.02%; p=0.045), and ongoing pregnancy rates was not found with significantly (72.00% vs 47.06%; p=0.105). Euploidy rate was significantly higher in the group of embryos with KS5=6 than in the group of embryos with KS5=1 (61.88% vs. 48.33%; p=0.006). Conclusion: Embryo selection by the use of the KS5 algorithm score improves implantation rates of single euploid blastocysts transfers. Furthermore, embryos with the highest KS5 score have a higher probability of being euploid and implanting.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle