Unconventional Therapy Use Among Children With Cancer in Saskatchewan
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The study aimed to estimate the prevalence of unconventional therapy use among children with cancer in Saskatchewan, including identification of the most commonly used therapies, and to describe families' expectations and experiences in doing so. Researchers used a cross-sectional survey design with semi-structured telephone interviews to suit the descriptive and explor atory inquiry and the population focus. The personal telephone interviews occurred during the fall and winter of 1996 to 1997, with the parents coming from a wide range of geographic areas in the province of Saskatchewan. Parents of all children who were aged 14 years or younger when diagnosed with cancer during 1994 and 1995 in Saskatchewan and still living at the time of the study were identified through the provincial cancer registry with the assistance of the Saskatchewan Cancer Agency. Of the 44 families partici pating (92% of those eligible), 36% reported using unconventional therapy for their child's cancer; another 21% considered it. Reasons included comple menting medical treatment, coping with side effects; making the child stron ger ; and stopping the cancer. Experiences were generally positive. Reasons for not using unconventional therapies included the child doing well and parents placing confidence in the medical system. Parents identified a need for better quality information about unconventional therapies. Unconventional therapies play a substantial complementary role in cancer care for children. Families need support to identify safe and potentially helpful therapies when they choose that route. This requires: more research about therapies' effectiveness; more accessible, quality information; and more training for health professionals in understanding and discussing unconventional therapies. There is considerable research showing that use of unconventional therapies, also known as comple mentary or alternative therapies, is high among adult cancer patients. Although it is likely reasonable to assume this may also be true for children, there is almost no research on children's use of unconventional therapies for cancer. Knowing the extent of children's use of unconventional therapies and whether those experiences have been beneficial or harmful is essential for parents and health professionals making quality care decisions for children.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».