MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4234293343 · doi:10.1353/nin.2001.0024

Batting Around

2000· article· en· W4234293343 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Donald Honig

Notice bibliographique

RevueNine · 2000
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAmerican Sports and Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMAGIC (telescope)LeagueArtArt history

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Batting Around Donald Honig Some years ago, as part of a pregame feature before baseball's annual All-Star game, a bat that had once been used by Babe Ruth was brought into the National League dugout and shown to some of the players. As seen on television, this sidebar served to reinforce the near-mythic position Ruth holds in baseball history. Players of the stature of Mike Schmidt and Pete Rose regarded the old piece of lumber with obvious awe. "Babe Ruth's, eh?" Schmidt asked as he hefted the stick that had once upon a time swirled in Ruth's mighty hands. "It's heavy, isn't it?" Schmidt said, making unspoken comparison with today's much lighter bats. When shown to Rose, the relic was gazed upon, untouched until it was offered to him. Then he clenched his fingers around the handle and laid the bat on his shoulder and took a few gentle half swings with it, than handed it back, smiling appreciatively. For these two eminent players, as well as for whoever else touched it, the bat evoked a certain magic. It had belonged to the most spectacular of all baseball players, the man whose name is synonymous with baseball. If it had been a baseball once held in the hand of Christy Mathewson or a glove worn by Honus Wagner, the magic would not have been the same, for it is the bat, more than anything else, that symbolizes baseball; it is the totemic image. A fastball may make a resounding thud in the catcher's mitt, but it is "the crack of the bat" that is baseball's call to excitement, its most captivating sound. When it was wedded to the lively ball in 1920, the baseball bat became a truly thunderous instrument, with Ruth the peerless exponent of the new dynamite, setting new home run records in three consecutive seasons, beginning with twenty-nine in 1919, the last year of the "dead" ball, mounting to fifty-one in 1920 and then fifty-four in 1921. It wasn't simply numbers with Ruth, it was also the prodigious distances into which the ball carried. Despite his being a notorious pull hitter, many pitchers preferred to work Ruth inside, willing to risk the home run rather than, as Cleveland ace Wes Ferrell put it, "decapitation." "You [End Page 284] can't believe," Ferrell said, "how fast he could move that bat. I've seen him hit line drives that the first baseman went up for and the ball would end up in the seats. Can you imagine one of those things hit straight back at you?" When asked to account for his remarkable long-distance slugging, Ruth said, "My theory is that the bigger the bat, the faster the ball will travel. It's the weight of the bat that drives the ball. Some of my bats weight as much as fifty-two ounces." By contemporary standards, fifty-two ounces is an astonishingly heavy bat; many of today's top sluggers use bats that are a good twenty ounces lighter, a considerable differential. Not everyone, however, agreed with Ruth's theory about the heavier the bat the more lethal. One man whose opinion was worth listening to was the St. Louis Cardinals' Rogers Horns by, Ruth's exact contemporary and a man regarded by many as the finest right-handed hitter ever (Horns by's .424 batting average in 1924 was the highest recorded in the twentieth century, while his career mark of .358 is second only to Cobb's .367). "It's bat speed that drives the ball," Hornsby said. "The faster you get your stick to the ball the harder you're going to hit it, and the lighter the stick the faster you're going to move it. To me," the always bluntly opinionated Hornsby said, "it makes perfect sense." (And continues to make perfect sense to this day, with the trend having turned to the lighter bat.) By nature, or maybe by preference, Hornsby was a loner. Not only did he have few close friends, he seemed to go out of his way to offend people, often speaking with a...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,499
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,501

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,4990,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,203
Écart entre enseignants0,191 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2000
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNineMême sujetAmerican Sports and LiteratureTravaux en français237 207