Introductory Notes. Memory Foretelling the Story: Essays on Fall on Your Knees

I In an essay that sketches a postmodern geography of western racisms, ethnicities, and identities, Ali Rattansi sets out to challenge the constancy of representational narratives of self and identity that foreground the coherent and rationalist archetypes of moder­nist discourses. Disrupting the conscious logic of intention and rationality, Rattansi posits the imaginary space of the psychic as an orientation from which unconscious desires, splitting, disavowal, identifications, and ambivalence blur the boundaries between one person’s end and another’s beginning. Confronted with the interminable task of self-definition in uncertain times, ‘‘difference’’ helps to set the limits between self and another, policing the recognizable (and not-so-recognizable) periphery of that which is not ‘I.’ Difference lays the groundwork for subjectivity by ‘‘precar­iously identifying where the ‘I’ ends and unknowable other begins’’ (Pellegrini 7). In a critique of the ‘‘endlessly expanding enumeration of difference’’ that gestures toward an infinite, yet impossible, politics of inclusion, Ann Pellegrini asks, ‘‘Where and when does this catalogue of identificatory markers end, if it does? And what is the relation between and amongst them?’’ (2). The relations between and amongst differences, relations for which an additive logic provides no palliative, might be sought after by asking another kind of question: What difference does difference make? This is a central question of Ann-Marie MacDonald’s novel, Fall on Your Knees. . Canadian Reviewof American Studies/Revuecanadienne d’e¤ tudesame¤ ricaines 35, no. 2, 2005 The articles in this special issue address the practice of reading literature as a dialogic encounter that elaborates the ways in which the self makes identifications in difference. This kind of reading practice asks how the unconscious is implicated in the work of reading and retains a curiosity about the kinds of insights that might unfold in reading resistance analytically: as symptomatic, for example, of the psychical conflicts that constitute the grounds of relationality. To work at the level of the psychoanalytic is to work, writes Frantz Fanon, ‘‘at the level of failures,’’ of breakdown as well as breakthrough (23). The dynamics of disengagement as well as those of engagement may be important to a theory of what it means to learn across difference. Can the conflicts and attach­ments made in the practice of reading say something about how we imagine the social? What kinds of fantasies and desires do we bring to the project of reading and what kinds of relationships do we have with texts? How do ambivalence and identification figure the constellation of history, identity, and the possibility of something new? These and other questions might be posed as questions of pedagogy, as troubling the ways in which the self becomes educated in and across difference.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.