Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Analysis: Glucocorticoids have long been a mainstay in immunosuppressive regimens in both adult and pediatric transplant recipients.Multiple complications including hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and metabolic syndrome are attributed to their longterm use, and data in adult patients shows that steroid-free transplant recipients have a lower risk of cardiovascular events and death. 1 The consequences of steroid use have prompted multiple clinical trials in adults to eliminate steroid usage relatively quickly after transplantation.Most studies have examined whether steroids could be eliminated after transplantation typically within the fi rst 3 months and a few have evaluated even more rapid elimination protocols.A meta-analysis of the randomized clinical trials (RCTs) prior to 2000 by Kasiske and colleagues, demonstrated increased acute rejection episodes and relative risk of graft failure with early withdrawal. 2 More recent studies with treatment protocols using mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and a calcineurin inhibitor have produced variable results, some showing increased rejection episodes and others not.3,4 Importantly, longterm patient and graft survival have been evaluated in adult transplant patients after steroid withdrawal only within observational cohorts.4,5 Thus, the question of long-term benefi ts in adults from early steroid withdrawal remains unresolved.This study by Höcker and colleagues differs from this body of literature.First, the authors examine steroid withdrawal in a pediatric population and second, steroid withdrawal is delayed to one year to reduce the risk of early acute rejection while simultaneously limiting important long-term adverse consequences of steroids in growing children.Thus, when evaluated within the context of prior clinical trial evidence on steroid sparing strategies in transplantation, the study by Höcker and colleagues should add to our clinical understanding of the potential benefi ts and limitations from one steroid withdrawal strategy.In their prospective, randomized, multicentered, controlled trial, Höcker and colleagues evaluate the effects of the late withdrawal (after >1 year of therapy) of corticosteroids in pediatric transplant recipients on measurements such as growth, hypertension, glucose and lipid metabolism, metabolic syndrome, and rejection.They demonstrated improved parameters in all areas, without increased rejection rates in a two year follow-up period.Patients enrolled in the study were considered to be at low immunological risk, as those with a high panel reactive antibody (>80%), recent acute rejections, prior steroid-resistant rejections, prior multiple rejection episodes, or biopsyproven chronic rejection were excluded from the trial.All patients were taking cyclosporine and mycofenolate mofetil along with corticosteroids.Validity and threats to validity: Patients underwent central randomization using concealed methods after block stratifi cation by pubertal status, a method to promote equity in both the control and intervention groups despite potential age-related differential responses to therapy.Enrollment and exclusion criteria were clearly defi ned and clinical data and endpoints were also rigorously measured as defi ned prior to the start of the study.The data was stringently analyzed by intentionto-treat, and only 2 patients (<5%, both from the intervention group) were lost to follow-up.The study demonstrated improved growth rates, lower blood pressure, lower cholesterol and glucose levels, lower body mass index (BMI) levels, and a reduced incidence of metabolic syndrome amongst children in the steroid withdrawal group.However, several issues that might limit study validity must be considered.Although the groups were analyzed with intention-to-treat, 30% of the intervention group and 21% of the control group Shorter Dialysis Time and Mortality
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,011 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,007 | 0,007 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,580 | 0,314 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».