Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This issue of IRRODL marks a significant evolution in the development of your open access, peer-reviewed, international, online learning journal.Changes include new enhancements to our delivery model and some changes in the Journal's editorial personnel.However, rest assured that IRRODL remains committed to providing our distance education research community readers with a high quality, open access e-journal.This issue marks the first change in editorship of IRRODL since its founding four years ago by Peter Cookson.Although I have taken over as Editor and Publisher, I am happy that Peter will continue supporting IRRODL as a member of our editorial board.I want to thank Peter for his considerable contribution in setting the vision and policy that has defined IRRODL, and for successfully leading the editorial and administrative activities that have created what is likely the mostly widely read, peer reviewed, distance education journal in the world.This issue also marks the first in our new "continuous batch" publication model.Beginning this issue, IRRODL will be published when we have enough quality, peer reviewed main and research note articles, book reviews, and technical notes to compile an issue.This publication model allows for more issues, of reasonable size, to be published than the twice a year publication practice of the past.In addition, the new model will reduce the delay between submission, editing, and publication.Continuous batch production also allows us to retain the coherency of a complete issue, and yet also reduces an overabundant email "alerts" typical of publications that publish single articles as they are accepted.We anticipate publishing between three to five issues per year, but the exact number will depend on the number of quality submissions and our peer reviewers' availability and production capacity.We are also striving to increase the numbers of special issues, specifically those that focus on geographic regions (we expect to have an Australian special issue early next year) or on topical issues related to significant happenings in open and distance learning.New guidelines related to process for editing a special issue are available from the IRRODL website.Finally, although we continue to support full and open access to IRRODL, we now have paid subscribers to IRRODL.The reason why we have opted to solicit 'paid subscribers' is because the Canadian Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council has a program designed to support scholarly journals published in Canada.To be eligible to apply for this funding, however, IRRODL needs at least 200 'paid subscribers' per year.Our current 7050 unpaid subscribers were deemed insufficient to demonstrate community demand!Thanks to the 280 distance educators who feel strongly enough about the value of Open Access and this journal, to donate a $10.00 subscription fee, we met this arbitrary criteria for this year and have submitted our grant Terry Anderson~ Editorial Something Old -Something New Volume 5, No. 2, August 20042 application -though we are not at all certain how successful that application will be.The voluntary subscriptions also demonstrate our capacity to expand support for IRRODL beyond that generously provided by Athabasca University.However, we do not intend to compromise on policies or on practices that might restrict access to IRRODL.Indeed, we are very concerned that most other major distance education journals are now commercially published or published only in print format -thus restricting access to all and especially to those in developing countries.We do not intend to let this happen to IRRODL.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,009 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,009 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,330 | 0,248 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; l’étiquette directe de Gemma et le classifieur distillé Codex s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».