MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4235572855 · doi:10.2523/71680-ms

Development and Use of a Through-Tubing Aluminum Cement Basket

2001· article· en· W4235572855 sur OpenAlexaffabout
J.S. Lam, J. R. Lee, Natasha Hands, R. Nelson, T. Murphy

Notice bibliographique

RevueProceedings of SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition · 2001
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueDrilling and Well Engineering
Établissements canadiensShell (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésExhibitionCitationLibrary scienceComputer scienceWorld Wide WebDownloadEngineeringInformation retrievalArt historyHistory

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Development and Use of a Through-Tubing Aluminum Cement Basket J.S. Lam; J.S. Lam Adams Pearson Associates Inc. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar J.R. Lee; J.R. Lee Lee Specialties Ltd. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar N. Hands; N. Hands Shell Canada Ltd. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar R. Nelson; R. Nelson Shell Canada Ltd. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar T. Murphy T. Murphy Shell Canada Ltd. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, September 2001. Paper Number: SPE-71680-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/71680-MS Published: September 30 2001 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Lam, J.S., Lee, J.R., Hands, N., Nelson, R., and T. Murphy. "Development and Use of a Through-Tubing Aluminum Cement Basket." Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, September 2001. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/71680-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Search Advanced Search AbstractAn ingenious and inexpensive removable through-tubing cement basket has been constructed for use in open or cased hole and highly corrosive environments. While the basket was designed specifically for use in deep sour gas wells with sulphur deposition problems, it can be used in any zonal isolation application. A conventional inflatable through-tubing bridge plug can be used in sour service, but its elastomeric components make the plug vulnerable in the presence of sulphur solvents and amine based corrosion inhibitors. The cement basket is constructed from 100% aluminum, which eliminates the problems associated with the elastomeric materials and assures complete removal with acid, thus leaving no debris in the well.In June 2000, the cement basket was successfully deployed in a deep, sour, horizontal gas well. The 54mm OD basket was run through the tapered 89/73mm OD tubing string before being expanded in the 127mm OD production liner and capped with 4 metres of calcium carbonate chips and 10 metres of cement to provide the pressure integrity. Once cemented, the basket became a plug providing well control for workover operations and a barrier preventing fluid and debris loss to the formation. Subsequently, the permanent packer was milled and retrieved, enabling a new packer and larger tubing to be installed. The aluminum basket with the carbonate and cement cap was successfully milled out using coiled tubing in less than three hours. A small quantity of acid was used to remove any debris from the cement basket and cement sheath from the liner wall.While the cement basket is a new development, it is deployed using conventional, field proven equipment. It is also simpler and offers the potential for cheaper solutions than a conventional expandable bridge plug. With the experience gained, the next challenge is to build a 42 mm O.D. plug to be set inside 178mm OD casing, which will be more universally applicable for wells in Western Canada and around the World.IntroductionDownhole operations require the use of plugs for a variety of reasons. For example, downhole plugs may be used to isolate a section of a wellbore or to abandon a zone in the reservoir. They are also used to control production from a well or to permit selective zonal work such as stimulating part of the reservoir. Downhole plugs can also be used as a platform in conjunction with cementing operations or to prevent debris from falling deeper into the wellbore. Debris can be naturally occurring or can be generated by operations such as the milling of a packer. Plugs are also commonly used to prevent fluid loss to the formation during workover operations, which might otherwise result in formation damage.In the production of highly sour reservoirs, downhole conditions can be highly corrosive, due to the presence of aggressive chemicals such as downhole solvents like dimethyl disulfide (DMDS), corrosion inhibitors, H2S, CO2, and elemental sulfur. To be useful in the production of such reservoirs, a downhole plug must remain functional in such a highly corrosive environment.It should be possible to remove the plug without leaving debris in the wellbore, which could interfere with subsequent operations or production of reservoir fluids. This is especially true for wells that are prone to scaling and sulfur deposition and that have no sump to hold the debris below the location of the downhole plug, such as in the case of a wellbore that is highly deviated or horizontal through the producing zone. Keywords: corrosion inhibition, acid, deployment, upstream oil & gas, bridge plug, production chemistry, society of petroleum engineers, aluminum cement basket, downhole plug, sulphur solvent Subjects: Production Chemistry, Metallurgy and Biology, Completion Installation and Operations, Corrosion inhibition and management (including H2S and CO2) This content is only available via PDF. 2001. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,144
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,499

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,031
Tête enseignante GPT0,226
Écart entre enseignants0,195 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2001
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueProceedings of SPE Annual Technical Conference and ExhibitionMême sujetDrilling and Well EngineeringTravaux en français237 207