Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The 31 st International Conference on Photonic, Electronic and Atomic Collisions (XXXI ICPEAC) was held in the region of Normandy, France, starting with the tutorials at the University of Caen Normandie on July 23, 2019, and followed by the main conference on July 24-30, 2019 at the Deauville International Conference Centre. Held biannually, ICPEAC is one of the largest conferences on the atomic and molecular physics calendar, and covers the recent progress in photonic, electronic, and atomic collisions with matter. With a history dating back to 1958, the ICPEAC has its second coming to France, the first of which being the 1977 edition in Paris. The organization of ICPEAC 2019, the tutorials, and some of the satellite meetings involved 15 French institutes belonging to CNRS and various universities or institutions, and located all over the country. With the selection of France as the ICPEAC XXXI venue the local organizers began their preparations six years ahead in anticipation of the event. The conference brought together 615 participants from 43 countries with 32% of young researchers (PhD students or doctors who defended their PhD less than 4 years ago) and 28% of female scientists. ICPEAC XXXI aroused the submission of 808 abstracts among which 41% were submitted by young scientists. In April 2019, the ICPEAC General Committee has reviewed 761 Regular Abstracts submitted before 10 March 2019 and has selected “hot topics” as Special Reports. The Local Organizing Committee has examined 47 post-deadline abstracts submitted before 15 June, 2019. The Scientific Conference Program included 749 abstracts that were scheduled for presentation in one of the five poster sessions organized according to 18 different topics representing the main fields of ICPEAC 2019. The full poster list is published in the Conference Handbook available on line and was distributed in printed form to the participants. Among these abstracts, 469 are presented in issues 6-23 of this volume of the Journal of Physics Conference Series. In addition, five plenary lectures by Joachim Burgdörfer (Institute of Theoretical Physics, TU-Wien, Austria), Klaus Bartschat (Drake University, USA), Christoph Bostedt (Paul Scherrer Institute & Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland), Astrid Bergeat (Institut des Sciences Moléculaires, University of Bordeaux, France), and Hidetoshi Katori (RIKEN & University of Tokyo, Japan) have been presented along with 62 progress reports and 28 special reports. Detailed write-ups of some of the invited lectures and reports are presented in issues 1-5 of this volume, constituting a tangible record of the meeting. Preceding the main conference, three distinguished scientists, Gordon Drake (University of Windsor, Canada), Anne L’Huillier (Lund Attosecond Science Center, LTH, Sweden) and Thomas Stöhlker (Helmholtz Institute Jena, Germany) gave tutorial lectures specifically designed for students and early-career researchers. During the conference, the 2019 IUPAP Young Scientist Prize was awarded to Andreas Mooser (Max-Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics & CERN) and Christian Smorra (CERN). The Sheldon Datz Prize for an Outstanding Young Scientist attending ICPEAC was awarded to Vincent Lemelin (Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiobiology, Sherbrooke University, Canada). The Local Organizing Committee would like to express its gratitude to the “Société Française de Physique”, the International Union for Pure and Applied Physics (IUPAP), the European Physical Society, the City of Deauville, the Normandy Region, the University of Caen Normandie and all the conference sponsors for their financial aid which made the event possible, offered the tutorials to all the young scientists, and supported 45% of them to attend the main conference. Finally, the Local Organizing Committee would like to thank all the ICPEAC participants for their support and contributions to the conference. The Editors, For the proceedings of the ICPEAC XXXI papers: Lorenzo Ugo Ancarani, LPCT, CNRS-Université de Lorraine Christian Bordas, ILM, CNRS-Université de Lyon Franck Lépine, ILM, CNRS-Université de Lyon Dominique Vernhet, INSP, CNRS-Sorbonne Université For the proceedings of the ICPEAC XXXI abstracts: Henri Bachau, CELIA, CNRS-Université de Bordeaux Richard Brédy, ILM, CNRS-Université de Lyon Olivier Dulieu, LAC, CNRS-Université Paris-Saclay Francis Penent, LCPMR, CNRS-Sorbonne Université Dominique Vernhet, INSP, CNRS-Sorbonne Université
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».