Revisiting the Drainage Relative Permeability Measurement by Centrifuge Method Using a Forward-backward Modelling Scheme
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Measurement of drainage relative permeability by the centrifuge method was first introduced by Hagoort1. It has been shown that capillary end effects can cause errors in the measurements if a minimum rotational speed is not honored2. To determine the ωmin, we propose maintaining the value of capillary-gravity number, N cg min, to be of the order of 10−2 or smaller, at which the capillary end effect becomes negligible. The above conclusions were determined by applying a forward numerical simulator developed for centrifuge experiments and applying Hagoort's method as a backward model. These forward and backward models form a forward-backward loop which is a powerful tool for error analysis such as determining the impact of capillary end effects. Introduction Measurement of drainage relative permeability using the centrifuge method was first introduced by Hagoort[1]. He viewed the gravity drainage process as a gravity stable Buckley- Leverett displacement with the same set of assumptions. In addition, he assumed constant centrifugal acceleration along the core length and infinite mobility for the gas phase. In the full version of this paper, it will be shown that these assumptions are reasonable. Nevertheless, error caused by capillary end effect is one of the issues in relative permeability measurements. In the centrifuge method, if the rotational speed, ω, of the experiment is not maintained above a critical minimum, the calculated relative permeability values will be underestimated[2]. Although Hagoort proposed a correction procedure for cases where the measurements are affected by capillary end effects, it has been shown that this procedure introduces some noise into the calculated relative permeability values. Further, it is not easy to perform Hagoort's correction procedure in core analysis laboratories; rather, it is much easier and preferable to avoid the problem entirely by designing the experiment with a proper rotational speed from the beginning. On the other hand, since the target of such measurements is usually in modelling gravity drainage processes, one would desire that the relative permeability measurements be obtained under a capillary dominated flow regime. That is to say, if the measurements are performed under severe rotational speeds, the de-saturation flow regime would not be a capillary dominated flow. The objective of this work is to introduce a criterion for designing relative permeability experiments so that the minimum rotational speed that minimizes capillary end effects is honoured. To find this criterion, a forward-backward modelling scheme is developed. The forward numerical model accepts arbitrary capillary pressure and relative permeability functions as inputs and simulates the centrifugal displacement process. The simulated centrifuge drainage results is then used as raw centrifuge data and processed by Hagoort's method as the backward model. The resulting relative permeability curve is then compared with the original input relative permeability to quantify the capillary end effect. Figure 1 shows the forward backward loop schematically.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».