MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4235959561 · doi:10.2523/108351-ms

Environmentally Sensitive Well Successfully Drills Underbalanced UsingRecycling Technology

2007· article· en· W4235959561 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kevin Schmigel, Scott Code

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueDrilling and Well Engineering
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésUnderbalanced drillingDrillingComputer scienceCitationPetroleum engineeringDrilling fluidEngineeringDatabaseEnvironmental scienceWorld Wide Web

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Environmentally Sensitive Well Successfully Drilled Underbalanced Using Recycling Technology Kevin Schmigel; Kevin Schmigel Weatherford Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Scott D. Code Scott D. Code Weatherford Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the IADC/SPE Managed Pressure Drilling & Underbalanced Operations, Galveston, Texas, U.S.A., March 2007. Paper Number: SPE-108351-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/108351-MS Published: March 28 2007 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Schmigel, Kevin, and Scott D. Code. "Environmentally Sensitive Well Successfully Drilled Underbalanced Using Recycling Technology." Paper presented at the IADC/SPE Managed Pressure Drilling & Underbalanced Operations, Galveston, Texas, U.S.A., March 2007. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/108351-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE/IADC Managed Pressure Drilling and Underbalanced Operations Conference and Exhibition Search Advanced Search AbstractIn 2005 a sour underbalanced horizontal gas well was designed and drilled in a pristine, environmentally sensitive region of southern Alberta, Canada. There were two primary drivers for the client. One was to remain under reservoir pressure throughout drilling and completion operations and the second driver was to safely recover 9.0% hydrogen sulfide (H2S) gas production and recycle the H2S contaminated drilling fluid. The well was not classified as critical sour because of its proximity to populated areas and a low well productivity of 0.015 E3m3/kPa (0.37 Mscf/psi); however, a cumulative flaring limit of 240 E3m3 (8.5 MMscf) was imposed by Alberta's Energy and Utility Board (EUB).Casing and hole sizes were optimized after confirming the well could be successfully drilled underbalanced to total depth (TD). Both well engineering and process engineering were integrated to provide the process and equipment to accommodate the sour well effluent while controlling the downhole multiphase flow and pressure environment. The injection gas for the underbalanced section was supplied via on-site compression from a sales quality gas supply line at a rate of up to 55 sm3/min (1,950 scf/m) at 10 000 kPa (1,450 psi). National Association of Corrosion Engineers (NACE) certified equipment was employed to create an enclosed gas and liquids separation system. The sour return gas was recompressed down an existing pipeline to a gathering station approximately 10 km (6.2 miles). To ensure the safety of the rig floor personnel, the drillstring was purged with an inert gas to the top float, and then bled off back to a low pressure separation system for drillstring connections.The well was successfully drilled underbalanced for 21 days, with 1.3% (8.5 E3M3)(0.3 MMscf) of the cummulative gas being flared. The use of recycled and recovered natural gas has economic benefits when compared to conventional disposable inert gas supplies, especially on a project basis.IntroductionConventional drilling of the underpressured, dolomitic limestone in the area created non-prodroductive time (NPT) associated with lost circulation and differentially stuck pipe. More importantly, the driver for this project was the induced reservoir damage caused by fluids and fines migration into the formation. To minimize formation damage, the well would need to be underbalanced drilled (UBD), thereby eliminating fluid loss, differential sticking, and the resulting fluid invasion that caused irrecoverable reservoir damage.The challenge of drilling of this field using underbalanced operations was that the reservoir not only contained methane, but also condensate and 9.0% H2S. The condensate and methane normally does not generate much concern for UBD other than an additional point of separation for the condensate prior to it reaching any atmospheric systems.The decision was made to employ recycling and recovery technology for both the drilling fluid and the lift gas to ensure the UBD operations could be completed without exceeding the EUB imposed flaring limited. Methane was used for the lift gas and was supplied from and recovered to a neighboring gas sales line at an average drillpipe injection rate of 52 sm3/min (1,830 scf/m) and 7,000 kPa (1,020 psi). Operational challenges, such as flush events causing over pressure shut downs on the suction side of the compressors, resulted in less than 1.3% of the cumulative net gas being flared on location.With sour underbalanced operations, there are many things to consider, from the drilling program to the emergency planning zone to the underbalanced surface equipment and results. The objective of this paper is to examine the pre-engineering, implementation, and the success of drilling a non-critical, Level 1 sour reservoir underblanced using recycling and recovery technologies and techniques. Keywords: drilling fluid management & disposal, annular pressure drilling, compressor, drilling fluids and materials, Upstream Oil & Gas, well effluent, pipeline, bottomhole, recycling, management system Subjects: Drilling Operations, Pressure Management, Drilling Fluids and Materials, Underbalanced drilling, Drilling fluid management & disposal This content is only available via PDF. 2007. IADC/SPE Managed Pressure Drilling and Underbalanced Operations Conference and Exhibition You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,017
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,057

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0000,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0170,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,003
Tête enseignante GPT0,179
Écart entre enseignants0,176 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetDrilling and Well Engineering→Travaux en français237 207→