MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4235995323 · doi:10.1002/cav.335

Editorial Issue VRCAI'08

2010· article· en· W4235995323 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Daniël Thalmann, Zhiyong Huang

Notice bibliographique

RevueComputer Animation and Virtual Worlds · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueAugmented Reality Applications
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésComputer scienceAnimationUsabilityAugmented realityPascal (unit)SketchComputer graphics (images)Human–computer interactionMultimediaAlgorithmProgramming language

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This special issue contains the journal extension of the Best Paper, Best Application and other five selected papers of ACM VRCAI 2008. The first paper by Hanhoon Park, NHK Science & Technical Research Laboratories, Japan, Jihyun Oh, Realtimevisual Inc., Byung-Kuk Seo and Jong-Il Park, Hanyang University, Korea, proposes an automatic method for flexibly adjusting the confidence of visual cues in model-based camera tracking. The adjustment is based on the conditions of the target object/scene and the reliability of the initial or previous camera pose. The method can achieve real-time performance and successfully applied to a mobile augmented reality (AR) guidance system for a museum. This paper is the Best Paper of VRCAI 2008. The second paper, by Guangzheng Fei, Communication University of China, Won-Sook Lee, University of Ottawa, Canada, Zijun Xin and Huikai Dong, Communication University of China, and Chris Joslin, Carleton University, Canada, describes an animation creation system called PASCAL that supports sketch based modeling and physics augmented locomotion simultaneously. The system uses sketches and reconfigurable space canvases as basic modeling primitives and uses physics to improve the expressiveness and efficiency of several animation techniques to obtain controllable and plausible locomotion animation. The usability evaluation of the system was conducted both with professional and novice animators. This paper wins the Best Application of VRCAI 2008. In the third paper, Yimin Wang and Jianmin Zheng, from Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, propose an edge-based parameterization method, in which the edges rather than the vertices of the mesh are treated as the target for parameterization. It first parameterizes the edges on the two boundaries of the tubular mesh, then parameterizes the internal edges based on the mean value coordinates, and finally computes the parameters of the mesh vertices. The method does not need cutting of the mesh. It improves conventional cutting-based algorithms, which cut the mesh to make it a disk topologically, and overcomes the problems of cutting paths that are the zigzag paths leading to suboptimal parameterizations and the difficulty in finding good cutting paths. Some applications such as surface fitting and texture mapping are also provided. Jie Zhang, Soh-Khim Ong, and Andrew Yeh-Ching Nee from National University of Singapore, present, in the next paper, an implementation of machining simulation in a real machining environment applying AR technology. This in situ machining simulation system allows a machinist to analyze the simulation process, adjust the machining parameters, and observe the results in real-time in a real machining environment. Such a system is useful for machinists and trainees during the trial and learning stages, allowing them to experiment with different machining parameters on a real machine without having to worry about possibilities of machine and tool breakages. Experiments were conducted on a real 3-axis CNC machine to validate and evaluate the performance of the system and the feedback from a survey carried out with the experiments is very positive. Corey Manders, Farzam Farbiz, Ka Yin Tang, Miaolong Yuan, Gim Guan Chua, and Susanto Rahardja of A*STAR Institute for Infocomm Research, Singapore, present, in the next paper, a system for interacting with 3D objects in a 3D virtual environment. Using the notion that a typical head-mounted display does not cover the user's entire face, they use a fiducial marker placed on the HMD to locate the user's exposed facial skin. Using this information, a skin model is built and combined with the depth information obtained from a stereo camera. The information when used in tandem allows the position of the user's hands to be detected and tracked in real time. Once both hands are located, the system allows the user to manipulate the object with five degrees of freedom (translation in x, y, and z axis with roll and yaw rotations) in virtual three-dimensional space using a series of intuitive hand gestures. In the sixth paper, by Jiejie Zhu and Zhigeng Pan of Beihang University and Zhejiang University, Chao Sun of Beihang University, and Wenzhi Chen of Zhejiang University, China, the authors propose an approach to separate occluded objects in multiple layers by utilizing depth, color, and neighborhood information. Scene depth is obtained by stereo cameras and two Gaussian local kernels are used to represent color and spatial smoothness. These three cues are intelligently fused in a probability framework, where the occlusion information can be safely estimated. Experiment results showed that the approach can correctly register virtual and real objects in different depth layers, and provide a spatial-awareness interaction environment. The seventh paper is also the last paper by Chunyong Ma, Ge Chen, Yong Han, Yongyang Qi, and Yong Chen of Ocean University of China. The paper introduces a virtual city oriented VR-GIS platform which synthesizes several latest information technologies including virtual reality, 3D geographical information system, remote sensing and multi-dimensional visualization. The platform is a seamless integration of VR functions and GIS analysis methods, which can be used to organize and present massive spatial data. It also supplies 3D spatial analysis functions, 3D visualization for spatial process and natural simulation, and serves as an engine platform for digital city. The two last papers will appear in the 5th regular special issue.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,136
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,456

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,010
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0030,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,002
Bibliométrie0,0040,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0110,004
Science ouverte0,0030,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0050,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1360,085

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,256
Écart entre enseignants0,248 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueComputer Animation and Virtual WorldsMême sujetAugmented Reality ApplicationsTravaux en français237 207