John R. Meyer, interviewed by John C. Brown
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
John Robert Meyer is the James W. Harpel Professor of Capital Formation and Economic Growth, Emeritus, in the Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts. He was born in Pasco, Washington in 1927 and was educated at the University of Washington (B.A., 1950) and at Harvard (Ph.D., 1955). He joined the Harvard economics faculty in 1955 and taught at Yale University from 1968 to 1973; he returned to Harvard as Professor of Transportation, Logistics and Distribution at Harvard Business School (1973-83), and taught in the Kennedy School until he retired in 1997. From 1967 to 1977 he was President of the National Bureau of Economic Research, a position which led to his move to New Haven to be closer to the Bureau’s offices in New York. On returning to Massachusetts in 1973 he took the Bureau’s headquarters with him to Cambridge, retaining the New York office as a branch. Early in his career he was awarded a Guggenheim Fellowship (1958-9) and a Ford Faculty Research Fellowship at Harvard (1962-3). He has served on the editorial boards of several economics journals and was editor of Explorations in Entrepreneurial History in 1957. Meyer received Harvard’s David A. Wells Prize for his Ph.D. dissertation (1955a) and was elected Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1968. His expertise in transportation economics and policy has led him to serve as advisor to the Canadian Pacific Railway (1974-81), the US Department of Transportation, and the World Bank. He was a board member of Conrail (1976-8) and of the Union Pacific Corporation (1978-2000), and served as UP’s Vice Chairman (1981-3). On his retirement he was honored with a conference whose presentations compose the Festschrift noted in the Part introduction. Since his retirement he has resided both in Cambridge and in Florida and has been writing his 24th book, Enduring Enterprise: Public Policy and the Development of North American Railroads in the 20th Century, with Robert E. Gallamore. The interview took place in Meyer’s office at the Kennedy School in September 1994 and was conducted by J B of Clark University, who writes:Together with Alfred Conrad, John Meyer played a key role in the early development of Cliometrics. Two of their papers and the resulting discussion were particularly influential in the practice of economic history. One is “The Economics of Slavery in the Antebellum South,” which recast the plantation economy in terms amenable to economic analysis. Their finding that the return to an investment in a slave matched the return available elsewhere is a well known contribution of the paper. It also established a long research agenda on interregional trade in slaves, the demography of slavery and other issues, within a coherent economic framework. The slavery paper also illustrated the methodological contribution presented in another piece they aimed at economic historians, “Economic Theory, Statistical Inference, and Economic History,” which argued that economic historians should look for generalizations and test specific hypotheses. This second paper articulated an analytical distinction between primary literary evidence and the indirect quantitative evidence that could be used to test the implications even of qualitative hypotheses.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».