MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4236703420 · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001145.pub3

Late (> 7 days) postnatal corticosteroids for chronic lung disease in preterm infants

2014· review· en· W4236703420 sur OpenAlexaff
Lex W. Doyle, Richard A. Ehrenkranz, Henry L. Halliday

Notice bibliographique

RevueCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2014
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Établissements canadiensQueen's University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineBlindingBronchopulmonary dysplasiaPediatricsAdverse effectRandomized controlled trialPlaceboDiseaseClinical trialIntensive care medicineInternal medicinePregnancyGestational ageAlternative medicinePathology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Many preterm infants who survive go on to develop chronic lung disease. This is probably due to persistent inflammation in the lungs. Corticosteroids have powerful anti-inflammatory effects and have been used to treat established chronic lung disease. However, it is unclear whether any beneficial effects outweigh the adverse effects of these drugs.To determine the relative benefits and adverse effects associated with late (> 7 days) postnatal systemic corticosteroid treatment compared with control (placebo or nothing) in the preterm infant with evolving or established chronic lung disease.We sought randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of postnatal corticosteroid therapy from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2013, Issue 8), MEDLINE (1966 through August 2013), handsearching paediatric and perinatal journals, and by examining previous review articles and information received from practising neonatologists. When possible, we contacted authors of all studies to confirm details of reported follow-up studies or to obtain any information about long-term follow-up where none had been reported.We selected RCTs of postnatal corticosteroid treatment initiated after seven days after birth in preterm infants with evolving or established chronic lung disease for this review.We extracted and analysed data regarding clinical outcomes including mortality, chronic lung disease, death or chronic lung disease, failure to extubate, complications in the primary hospitalisation, and long-term health outcomesTwenty-one RCTs enrolling a total of 1424 participants were eligible for this review. All were randomised controlled trials, but the methods for random allocation were not always clear. Allocation concealment, blinding of the intervention and blinding of the outcome assessments were mostly satisfactory. Late steroid treatment was associated with a reduction in neonatal mortality (at 28 days), but not mortality at discharge or latest reported age. Benefits of delayed steroid treatment included reductions in failure to extubate by three, seven or 28 days, chronic lung disease at both 28 days and 36 weeks' postmenstrual age, need for late rescue treatment with dexamethasone, discharge on home oxygen, and death or chronic lung disease at both 28 days and 36 weeks' postmenstrual age. There was a trend towards an increase in risk of infection and gastrointestinal bleeding, but not necrotising enterocolitis. Short-term adverse affects included hyperglycaemia, glycosuria and hypertension. There was an increase in severe retinopathy of prematurity, but no significant increase in blindness. There was a trend towards a reduction in severe intraventricular haemorrhage, but only 247 infants were enrolled in five studies reporting this outcome. The trends to an increase in cerebral palsy or abnormal neurological examination were partly offset by a trend in the opposite direction in death before late follow-up. The combined rate of death or cerebral palsy was not significantly different between steroid and control groups. Major neurosensory disability, and the combined rate of death or major neurosensory disability, were not significantly different between steroid and control groups. There were no substantial differences between groups for other outcomes in later childhood, including respiratory health or function, blood pressure or growth, although there were fewer with a clinically important reduction in the forced expired volume in one second (FEV1) on respiratory function testing.The benefits of late corticosteroid therapy may not outweigh actual or potential adverse effects. Although there continues to be concern about an increased incidence of adverse neurological outcomes in infants treated with postnatal steroids, this review of postnatal corticosteroid treatment for chronic lung disease initiated after seven days of age suggests that late therapy may reduce neonatal mortality without significantly increasing the risk of adverse long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. However, the methodological quality of the studies determining the long-term outcome is limited in some cases; in some studies the surviving children have only been assessed before school age, when some important neurological outcomes cannot be determined with certainty, and no study was sufficiently powered to detect increased rates of important adverse long-term neurosensory outcomes. Given the evidence of both benefits and harms of treatment, and the limitations of the evidence at present, it appears prudent to reserve the use of late corticosteroids for infants who cannot be weaned from mechanical ventilation and to minimise the dose and duration of any course of treatment.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,009
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,016
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche, Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Revue systématique · Signal consensuel: Revue systématique
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,281
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0090,016
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0130,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,121
Tête enseignante GPT0,455
Écart entre enseignants0,334 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeRevue systématique
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations81
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsMême sujetNeonatal Respiratory Health ResearchTravaux en français237 207