Die Erkundungsreisen der Herrnhuter Missionare nach Labrador (1752–1770): Kommunikation mit Menschen einer nicht-schriftlichen Kultur
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This book is the slightly abridged publication of a doctoral dissertation submitted to the University of Dresden in 2007. It is based essentially on diaries, journals, and letters of six Moravian missionaries—Johannes Erhardt, Jens Haven, Christian Drachardt, Andreas Schloezer, John Hill, and Steffen Jensen—who pioneered communication with Labrador Inuit between 1752 and 1770. These Moravians recorded everything they did and observed in compliance with the assignment of their mission driven by an Enlightenment-inspired, open-minded curiosity about natural phenomena, such as human psychology and indigenous cultures. Their records, now held in the Unity Archives at Herrnhut, Germany, enabled Olsthoorn to reconstruct the missionaries' experiences and analyze them in the context of modern communication theory.Olsthoorn attributes her interest in Inuit to her fascination with the Canadian North—its icebergs, whales, and native peoples—a fascination widespread among people growing up in the urbanized world of Germany and the Netherlands. This fascination carries over into parts of her painstakingly meticulous documentation of how the Moravian missionaries managed to bridge the gulf between their highly literate eighteenth-century European culture and the Stone Age culture of the illiterate Inuit. Her sources reveal how the Moravians accomplished this feat without resorting to force at a time when colonial powers had no qualms about using force in their encounters with native peoples.Of the book's four chapters, the first three are the most intelligible and appear to be the most relevant. Chapters 1 and 3 trace Moravian difficulties in reaching Labrador Inuit in 1752, 1764, 1765 and 1770, against the background of French and English colonial rivalries and these powers' dealings with Inuit. Chapter 2 highlights challenges posed by Inuit appearance, character, and culture, as well as by European conceptions of native people in the Age of Enlightenment. Lengthy excerpts from the missionaries' diaries focus on their skills as facilitators of communication and highlight their multifaceted, and at times riveting, experiences with Governor Palliser, English naval captains, fishermen, and Inuit, in their endeavors to establish a mission in Labrador. Special attention is given to the personalities and pedagogic approaches of Jens Haven and Christian Drachardt, and to the Inuk woman Mikak whose conversion and contacts facilitated Moravian efforts. Chapter 4 reviews select theoretical approaches to an analysis of “effective” communication. Starting with an exposition of Schulz von Thun's 1981 model that Olsthoorn applies to Haven's communication with Mikak, the chapter continues by discussing concepts developed by Johann Gottfried Herder (1772) and Eugene A. Nida (1960), and ends with a discourse on the philosophical foundations of Zinzendorf's theology.The evidence gleaned from the missionaries' accounts reveals that until 1769 repeated Moravian attempts to establish a mission in Labrador were thwarted by ongoing hostilities between English fishermen and Inuit as well as by naval captains' obstructions of the missionaries' objectives, apparently in accordance with English government policy. In 1752 Erhardt and five of his first Moravian exploration party were killed by Inuit who disliked Europeans and may have mistaken them for Englishmen. After the Seven Years' War, the English restricted Moravian access to Inuit. At the same time, the English were anxious to exploit Moravians as interpreters and cartographers in their efforts to expel the French from Labrador, with whom Inuit had been trading peacefully. By 1769, however, the English had failed to pacify the Inuit by force and hostilities had spiraled out of control. Christianizing them now appeared as the only way to secure English control over the Labrador fishery, so Moravians were finally given permission to settle with Inuit.Olsthoorn's excerpts shed light on the enormous impact the Moravians had in teaching Inuit not to steal and kill. These behavioral changes halted the violent encounters between colonial authorities and Labrador Inuit, pacified the Inuit, and averted the execution of genocidal designs against them. The missionaries succeeded because they rejected contemporary European conceptions of native peoples as inferior humans, treated Inuit as equals, and were able to speak Inuktitut, a language Haven and Drachardt had learned while engaged in prior missionary work among Greenland Inuit. Olsthoorn emphasizes that the missionaries, especially Jens Haven, tried to understand Inuit psyche, adopted Inuit body language, and endeavored to identify as Inuit. Haven's own character and communication skills appear as major facilitating factors. In response, Inuit accepted the missionaries as “humans” (Inuit), a privilege they did not extend to other Europeans at the time.This is not the first account of how Jens Haven and his fellow missionaries initiated contact with Labrador Inuit. A sizable body of multidisciplinary research has dissected numerous aspects dealing with the early history of the Labrador mission and Inuit. The value of Olsthoorn's publication lies in the transcription of excerpts from manuscripts written in a near-incomprehensible German style and antiquated German script. The format of presentation, however, is marred by the absence of an introduction setting out the historiographic context, methodology, and argument, and the lack of a conclusion summarizing the findings. These are standard requirements for a PhD thesis and any serious scholarly study. The various new issues raised in chapter 4 do not provide an adequate conclusion of the book and might have been more meaningfully summarized at the beginning. In particular, the disproportionately detailed elaborations on theoretical concepts by Schulz von Thun, Mika, and others, tend to detract from, rather than enhance, the findings of the other chapters. Readability of the entire book might have benefitted from some competent copyediting, including streamlining its organization and weeding out tedious redundancies and digressions. In its present form, the potential of this published dissertation is difficult to appreciate by anyone but the specialist.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».