Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Medical Council of Canada (MCC) has announced that a variety of updates and improvements to the MCC Qualifying Examination (MCCQE) Part I will be implemented during the 2019 calendar year. The updated exam will be offered in Canada and internationally starting in April/May 2019, and candidates whose applications have been accepted will be able to schedule their exam appointments online as of mid-January 2019.The updates to the exam were made following recommendations from the MCC's Assessment Review Task Force (ARTF), including offering the MCCQE Part I more frequently. The lengthy process of updating the exam is coming to completion and the MCC has confirmed that the exam will be offered four times in 2019 and five times as of 2020.In addition to the fiexibility linked to the frequency of the administrations, the MCC has also sought to make it more accessible to Canadian and international medical students and graduates. To facilitate this, the MCCQE Part I has been moved to a vendor-delivered exam. Prometric was selected to administer the new MCCQE Part I in Canada and in more than 80 countries worldwide.According to the MCC, increased fiexibility can also be found in the MCCQE application process. Starting in January 2019, candidates will be able to schedule their exam through Prometric and select their desired location from the many sites available around the world as soon as their application has been processed and accepted.The MCC has also created information sheets to help Canadian and international medical students and graduates navigate through the MCCQE Part I information. The documents cover a range of topics, including eligibility, scheduling and preparatory resources.Source: Medical Council of Canada Echo Newsletter, December 2018The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Prince Edward Island (Canada) has joined the International Association of Medical Regulatory Authorities (IAMRA).IAMRA currently has 116 members from 48 countries. To learn more about IAMRA, visit www.iamra.com.Source: IAMRA website announcementNew research from the UK's General Medical Council (GMC) has highlighted a future workforce crisis that could impact patient care.Commissioned by the GMC for its 2018 “The State of Medical Education and Practice in the UK” report, the research paints a stark picture of pressure on the delivery of UK health services — including steps physicians are taking to cope with growing workloads.Among those measures are making referrals to other physicians that are not strictly necessary but happen due to limited time to address patient concerns, ordering blood tests when they may not always be needed, and bypassing clinical checklists in order to get through workload.The GMC research indicates many physicians are considering career changes to step away from heavy workloads. Around a third of 2,600 physicians surveyed are considering reducing their hours in the next three years. A fifth are planning to move to part-time status and another fifth plan to leave the UK to work abroad. Of particular concern, according to the GMC, is that 21% of physicians 45–54 years of age and two-thirds of those 55–64 years of age intend to take early retirement by 2021.Source: GMC news release, December 5, 2018
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle