MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4236838480 · doi:10.1353/his.2020.0025

Remembering Women's Activism by Sharon Crozier-De Rosa and Vera Mackie

2020· article· en· W4236838480 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Karen Hunt

Notice bibliographique

RevueHistoire sociale · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueHistorical Gender and Feminism Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSuffrageMilitantCitizenshipNarrativePoliticsGender studiesTolerationSociologyHistoryArtLawPolitical scienceLiterature

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Remembering Women's Activism by Sharon Crozier-De Rosa and Vera Mackie Karen Hunt Crozier-De Rosa, Sharon, and Vera Mackie – Remembering Women's Activism. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2019. Pp. 254. In Britain, the year 2018 saw the commemoration of the centenary of the partial enfranchisement of women. Overwhelmed by a tsunami of purple, white, and green (the colours of the militant Women's Social & Political Union), the complex story of the evolving campaign for women's suffrage was drowned in local and national celebrations that often had little to do with the complexities of history. A diverse and evolving campaign had been overwhelmed by a polarized suffragist-suffragette narrative. One family name—Pankhurst—had come to stand for a vast array of women whose activism in pursuit of citizenship took many forms. Despite the hard work of suffrage historians in scholarly and popular works, the centenary of some women winning the right to vote was "remembered" in ways which flattened, simplified, and in the end too-often misrepresented an important example of women's activism. So, a book entitled Remembering Women's Activism is timely if we are to understand collective acts of remembering such as Vote100 (as the British commemorations were branded). Sharon Crozier-De Rosa and Vera Mackie explore the gendered dimensions of history and memory through a series of well-chosen case studies. They reveal absences in gendered memory as well as how memories are constantly being reinterpreted, often diverging in significant ways from the initial acts of remembering. Their discussion shows how gender informs and shapes our understandings of history and memory as it intersects with a whole range of other structures of power. They do this by focusing on a variety of what they term "mnemonic practices" such as street names, statues, banknotes, and other forms of material culture together with all sorts of mass media. A final example explores a particular "embodied political practice," the street demonstration inspired by historicizing the Women's Marches of 2017. The text is illustrated by the authors' photos, which supplement their dissection of the various representations of women activists and the sites of their activism. Women's activism is defined here as challenges to the gendered status quo. The choice of case studies makes this book, drawing on examples from a range of places and times. They centre on women's suffrage, women who took part in violent anticolonial struggles, women workers and those who fought to improve their working conditions, and survivors of militarized sexual violence in the Second World War and the campaign for reparations from the Japanese government. For this reader, the least familiar stories and memorials provoked the most thought and provided examples of the kind of memorializing interventions that could be deployed in other places and in relation to other forms of women's activism. Some responses are particularly striking. One example concerns the terrible fire at the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory in New York in 1911 that took the lives of 146 mainly women garment workers trapped in a factory whose doors had been locked partly to prevent access to union organizers. Unable to flee from a floor well beyond the reach of the fireman's ladders and with no fire escape, many jumped to their deaths. A number of memorials have sought to remember the victims and the [End Page 481] ensuing campaign to reform working conditions. A simple but powerful idea is the annual chalking of the name and age of every victim of the fire on the pavement outside their individual tenement addresses. The chalk inscriptions are gradually worn away over the ensuing weeks by weather and passing pedestrians only for the memorial to be renewed the following year. Here is a physical reminder of the way in which the memory of the Triangle fire has alternately waned and been revived over the years as well as the fact that for many decades the victims were nameless. This infamous fire continues to resonate across the world, for example, with the collapse in 2013 of a Dhaka garment factory complex in which well over 1,200 workers were killed. Both examples prompted women's...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,022
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,074

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,004
Communication savante0,0070,006
Science ouverte0,0010,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,007
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0220,007

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,263
Écart entre enseignants0,236 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueHistoire socialeMême sujetHistorical Gender and Feminism StudiesTravaux en français237 207