MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4236902342 · doi:10.1353/mdr.2006.0078

When We Dead Awaken : A Scene That Gets out of Control

2006· article· en· W4236902342 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Michael Goldman

Notice bibliographique

RevueModern Drama · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueCultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHAMLET (protein complex)Character (mathematics)DramaScripting languageClosetArtVisual artsLiteratureAestheticsHistoryComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

When We Dead Awaken:A Scene That Gets out of Control Michael Goldman (bio) The scene referred to in the title of this article belongs to a type that is important in Ibsen; it gets out of control in the sense that its characters let it get away from them. Broadly speaking, of course, all decent dramatic scenes get out of control in this way. When any two characters come onstage, each has a script of |his own in mind, a notion of how the scene is supposed to go, and the drama comes not from Hamlet's script or Gertrude's script, say, but from the clash between scripts as they argue in her closet. Indeed, a good way of getting actors to play a big scene freshly and spontaneously is to urge them to concentrate, not on the script that they have memorized, but on the script their character thinks will be played when the scene begins. Naturally this principle can be observed in all of Ibsen's scenes. At one level, it is a matter for Playwriting 101, but the specific version I'm concerned with belongs perhaps in Playwriting 1001 or even in Playwriting a million and one. For the Ibsen scenes I'm thinking of veer out of hand in a uniquely disruptive way, and at least one of the characters becomes sharply aware that he or she has lost control. Probably the best known example - too well known to need much elaboration here - is the stocking scene in Doll's House, when Rank's responses to Nora's hints about her financial difficulties reveal a sexual subtext to their relationship that Nora has always kept hidden from herself. Suddenly, Nora's most likely source of help is cut off, and she begins to feel the seismic tremors that will eventually shake the whole structure of her identity, while Rank, dismayed and baffled, tries flailingly to put the genie back in the bottle. Of the same type but less frequently commented on is the wonderful scene early in Master Builder when Hilda arrives at Solness's door. As Solness and Dr. Herdal welcome her, the two old friends clearly feel [End Page 387] that they enjoy a certain kind of male privilege. Because Hilda with her walking costume and casual manner has apparently ventured slightly beyond the conventions of dress and behaviour that protect young women, the two men are free, without any stigma of impropriety, to adopt a bantering, slightly suggestive manner of speech, into which Hilda is supposed to enter and whose (again slightly) demeaning sexual terms she is supposed to accept. But the scene gets out of hand for Solness. It is really exquisitely funny, although it paves the way for the terrifying intensities that follow. Herdal initiates the process flirtatiously: HERDAL. We met up at one of those mountain lodges last summer . . . What happened to all those other young ladies? HILDA. Oh, they went off down the west slope. HERDAL. They didn't quite like all our fun in the evenings. HILDA. No, they certainly didn't. HERDAL. (shaking his finger at her) Of course, we can't say you didn't flirt with us a bit. HILDA. I'd a lot rather do that than sit knitting knee socks with all the old hens. HERDAL. (laughing) I couldn't agree with you more! (800-01). The doctor draws Solness in his wake, and as the scene develops and Hilda and Solness are left alone on stage, Solness feels confident enough in his sexual control of the scene to approach a topic that he might ordinarily have avoided - he is ready to reminisce freely about that day in Lysanger ten years ago when he climbed the new church tower. His confidence seems only to be underwritten by Hilda's apparently acquiescent playfulness. Gradually things get out of hand: HILDA. When the tower was finished, we had a big function. SOLNESS. Yes, that's one day I won't soon forget. HILDA. (smiling) Won't you? So good of you! SOLNESS. Good? (805) Solness is a little surprised at the details this charming, obviously impressionable girl remembers but is willing to accept...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,017
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,058

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0100,007
Communication savante0,0070,005
Science ouverte0,0010,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0170,004

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,065
Tête enseignante GPT0,278
Écart entre enseignants0,214 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueModern DramaMême sujetCultural Studies and Interdisciplinary ResearchTravaux en français237 207