Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The EXPRESS workshops aim at bringing together researchers interested in the relations between various formal systems, particularly in the field of Concurrency. More specifically, they focus on the comparison between programming concepts (such as concurrent, functional, imperative, logic and object-oriented programming) and between mathematical models of computation (such as process algebras, Petri nets, event structures, modal logics, rewrite systems etc.) on the basis of their relative expressive power. For online-information see http://express02.epfl.ch/ . The EXPRESS workshops were originally held as meetings of the HCM project EXPRESS, which was active with the same focus from January 1994 till December 1997. The first three workshops were held respectively in Amsterdam (1994, chaired by Frits Vaandrager), Tarquinia (1995, chaired by Rocco De Nicola), and Dagstuhl (1996, co-chaired by Ursula Goltz and Rocco De Nicola). The workshop in 1997, which took place in Santa Margherita Ligure and was co-chaired by Catuscia Palamidessi and Joachim Parrow, was organized as a conference with a call for papers and a significant attendance from outside the project. The 1998 workshop was held as a satellite workshop of the CONCUR'98 conference in Nice, co-chaired by Ilaria Castellani and Catuscia Palamidessi, and like on that occasion EXPRESS'99 was hosted by the CONCUR'99 conference in Eindhoven, co-chaired by Ilaria Castellani and Björn Victor. The EXPRESS'00 workshop was held as a satellite workshop of CONCUR 2000, Pennsylvania State University, USA, co-chaired by Luca Aceto and Björn Victor. The EXPRESS'01 workshop was held at BRICS, Aalborg University as a satellite of CONCUR'01 and was co-chaired by Luca Aceto and Prakash Panangaden. In addition to the nine accepted (out of 30 submitted) papers presented at the workshop, this collection also contains the abstracts of the two invited talks by Catuscia Palamidessi and Igor Walukiewicz. We would like to thank the authors of the submitted papers, the invited speakers, and the members of the program committee for their contribution to both the meeting and this volume. We also would like to thank EPFL for the printing and Michael Mislove and Simon Kramer for his help with the editing of the preliminary proceedings, the CONCUR organizing committee at Brno University for hosting EXPRESS'02, especially the workshop coordinator Antonín Kucera for further local organization. EXPRESS'02 Programme Committee Martin Berger (U. London, UK), Alan Jeffrey (DePaul U., USA), Barbara König (TU München, DE), Francois Laroussinie (ENS Cachan, FR), James Leifer (INRIA Rocquencourt, FR), Massimo Merro (EPFL, CH), Faron Moller (U. Wales, Swansea, UK), Uwe Nestmann (EPFL, CH), Prakash Panangaden (McGill U., CA), Arend Rensink (U. Twente, NL), Peter Sewell (U. Cambridge, UK), Gianluigi Zavattaro (U. Bologna, IT), EXPRESS'02 Additional Referees Luca Aceto, Alessandro Aldini, Paolo Baldan, Paolo Ballarini, Béatrice Bérard, Henrik Bohnenkamp, Alexandre Boisseau, Mario Bravetti, Roberto Bruni, Marzia Buscemi, Nadia Busi, Didier Caucal, Vincent Cremet, Silvano Dal-Zilio, Vincent Danos, Stéphane Demri, Simon Gay, Daniel Hirschkoff, Michael Huth, Ole Høgh Jensen, Astrid Kiehn, Huimin Lin, Sergio Maffeis, Monika Maidl, Nicolas Markey, Fabio Martinelli, Robin Milner, Francesco Zappa Nardelli, Mikkel Nygaard, Martin Otto, Laure Petrucci, Carla Piazza, Jorge Sousa Pinto, Rosario Pugliese, Marina Ribaudo, Christine Röckl, Stefan Römer, Alan Schmitt, Philippe Schnoebelen, Stefan Schwoon, Martin Steffen, Simone Tini, Björn Victor, Walter Vogler, Heike Wehrheim, Lucian Wischik, Pascal Zimmer.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle