MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4237151822 · doi:10.1542/gr.39-3-29

Bruising Patterns in Young Children With Bleeding Disorders

2018· article· en· W4237151822 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueAAP Grand Rounds · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHemophilia Treatment and Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineCitationIconPediatricsObservational studyInternal medicineLibrary science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Source: Collins PW, Hamilton M, Dunstan FD, et al. Patterns of bruising in preschool children with inherited bleeding disorders: a longitudinal study. Arch Dis Child. 2017; 102: 1110– 1117; doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-310196Investigators from multiple institutions in the United Kingdom and Canada conducted a prospective observational study to characterize bruising in young children with bleeding disorders. Study participants were patients <6 years old recruited from 6 hemophilia centers. These children were characterized as having either a severe bleeding disorder (levels of factors VIII/IX or XI <1 IU/dL or type 3 von Willebrand disease [vWD]) or a mild/moderate disorder (levels >1 IU/dL or type 1 or 2 vWD). A comparison group of control children without bleeding disorders was also enrolled. The developmental status of participants was categorized as premobile, early mobile (crawling and/or cruising), or walking. On a weekly basis for 12 weeks, parents recorded the number, location, and measured size of all bruises noted on their child. Main study outcomes included the mean number of bruises per data collection, percentage of data collections with at least one bruise noted, number of collections with a bruise >1 cm, and location of bruises. Longitudinal analysis was performed using multilevel modeling to compare outcomes among children with bleeding disorders and controls.Data were analyzed on 103 study participants with bleeding disorders, including 57 with a severe disorder, and 328 controls. Among premobile children, at least one bruise was noted at 52% of data collections in those with a severe bleeding disorder, compared to 7% of collections in controls. Overall, the number of bruises per collection was significantly higher in those with a severe or mild/moderate bleeding disorder than control children (mean number of bruises per data collection 1.06, 0.19, and 0.09, respectively). The rate of bruising increased in early mobile and walking children without a bleeding disorder (>1 bruise noted at 46% and 79% of data collections, respectively); however, the mean number of bruises for participants with severe or mild/moderate bleeding disorders per collection was significantly higher at each of these developmental stages than in controls. At least one bruise >1 cm was noted during 1.0% of data collections for premobile controls, compared to 3.4% of those with mild/moderate bleeding disorders and 24.6% of those with severe bleeding disorders. In premobile children, bruises on the cheeks, neck, buttocks, eyes, and genitalia were rare among those with bleeding disorders (noted on <0.5% of data collections) and absent in controls.The authors conclude that young children with bleeding disorders have more, and larger, bruises than those without a bleeding disorder at all developmental stages.Dr Hogan has disclosed no financial relationship relevant to this commentary. This commentary does not contain a discussion of an unapproved/investigative use of a commercial product/device.Although significant bruising in young, healthy children may indicate a hemostatic disorder, non-accidental injury, or both, the determination of severity is often subjective.1 The location, number, and size of bruises vary with motor development, trauma, and acquired or inherited bleeding disorders.2 Excessive bruising in ambulatory children on bony prominences of the limbs is often due to bleeding disorders, while bruising over the head, neck, back, palms/soles, and long bones, or on any location in infants <4 months of age, may signal abuse.3 However, bruising locations may overlap.4 Infants and toddlers are less likely to need surgery or are too young for menorrhagia, which are frequent prompts for mild to moderate bleeding disorder testing in older children.5 Laboratory results, especially for mild bleeding disorders, are sometimes difficult to interpret.5 For these reasons, the current study of bruising characteristics in premobile and mobile children with mild to severe bleeding disorders may be a useful screening tool for pediatricians and hematologists.Study limitations included combining mild and moderate bleeding disorders, as well as reporter bias. Acquired bruising issues due to medications (eg, aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), vitamin K deficiency, and vasculitis were not investigated.1,5 Children with more rare bleeding disorders, such as deficiency or dysfunction of factor I, II, V, VII, X, or XIII, were not included in this analysis.2,5Although bruising severity is subjective, larger and more numerous bruises appear on preschool children with severe hemophilia A, hemophilia B, or type 3 vWD, compared to unaffected children.The results of this study confirm those of prior investigations. Bruising in premobile infants and in mobile young children in specific locations (eg, ears, genitalia) raises the specter of abuse. (See related article AAP Grand Rounds, April 2015;33[4]:42.6)

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,011
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,329

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,289
Écart entre enseignants0,274 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAAP Grand RoundsMême sujetHemophilia Treatment and ResearchTravaux en français237 207