Maternal Alcohol Use, Adverse Neonatal Outcomes and Pregnancy Complications in British Columbia, Canada: A Population-based Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background The current study aimed to estimate the prevalence of alcohol use identified as a risk factor during pregnancies by the antenatal care providers, resulting in live births in British Columbia (BC) and to examine associations between alcohol use, adverse neonatal outcomes, and pregnancy complications. Methods This population-based cross-sectional study utilized linked obstetrical and neonatal records within the BC Perinatal Data Registry (BCDPR), for deliveries that were discharged between January 1, 2015 and March 31, 2018. The main outcome measures were alcohol use identified as a risk factor during pregnancy, associated maternal characteristics, pregnancy complications, and adverse neonatal outcomes. Estimates for the period and fiscal year prevalence were calculated. Chi-square tests were used to compare adverse neonatal outcomes and pregnancy complications by alcohol use during pregnancy. Logistic regression was used to examine the association between alcohol use during pregnancy and adverse neonatal outcomes and pregnancy complications, after adjusting for identified risk factors. Results A total of 144,779 linked records within the BCDPR were examined. The period prevalence of alcohol use during pregnancy identified as a risk factor was estimated to be 1.1% and yearly prevalence was 1.1%, 1.1%, 1.3% and 0.9% from the 2014/2015 fiscal year to 2017/2018, respectively. Indicated alcohol use was associated with younger maternal age, fewer antenatal visits, being nulliparous, a history of mental illness, substance use and smoking. Alcohol-exposed neonates had greater odds of being diagnosed with low birth weight (aOR = 1.25; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.53), other respiration distress of newborn (aOR = 2.57; 95% CI: 1.52, 4.07), neonatal difficulty in breastfeeding (aOR = 1.97; 95% CI: 1.27, 2.92) and unspecified feeding problems (aOR = 2.06; 95% CI: 1.31, 3.09) Conclusions The prevalence of alcohol use during pregnancy identified as a risk factor, estimated in this study, was comparable to the previous estimates within BCDPR. Prenatal alcohol exposure was associated with notable differences in maternal and neonatal characteristics and adverse neonatal outcomes. More consistent and thorough screening and prevention efforts targeting alcohol use in pregnancy are urgently needed in Canada.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».