Improved Heavy Oil Recovery by CO2 Injection Augmented with Chemicals
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Improved Heavy Oil Recovery by CO2 Injection Augmented with Chemicals Y. P. Zhang; Y. P. Zhang Saskatchewan Research Council Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar P.. Luo; P.. Luo Saskatchewan Research Council Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar S.. Huang S.. Huang Saskatchewan Research Council Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China, Beijing, China, June 2010. Paper Number: SPE-131368-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/131368-MS Published: June 08 2010 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Zhang, Y. P., Luo, P.. , and S.. Huang. "Improved Heavy Oil Recovery by CO2 Injection Augmented with Chemicals." Paper presented at the International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China, Beijing, China, June 2010. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/131368-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China Search Advanced Search Abstract During water-alternating-gas (WAG) flooding for heavy oil reservoirs, the adverse mobility ratio leads to a considerable amount of injection gas fingering through and overriding the oil zone. To improve the recovery efficiency of the WAG process in a Saskatchewan (Canada) heavy oil reservoir, the Saskatchewan Research Council (SRC) conducted a laboratory feasibility study of augmenting the injection water with chemicals (alkaline/surfactant/polymer). The resulting process is known as CAG, or chemical-alternating-gas (CO2 or flue gas). SRC's integrated approach included interfacial tension (IFT) and rheology measurements, phase behaviour studies, micromodel displacements, and corefloods to evaluate the effectiveness of the CAG process. The results showed that addition of ASP into the injection water could significantly lower IFT (to 10−2 mN/m) and improve mobility. The phase behaviour studies indicated that CO2 could be dissolved readily into reservoir heavy oil at moderate pressures (3.4–6.4 MPa), resulting in dramatic oil expansion (1.2–8.1%) and viscosity reduction (45–88%). It was also demonstrated that the presence of 70% N2 in the CO2 stream (i.e., flue gas) greatly reduced the gas solubility, causing negligible oil swelling and viscosity reduction at the reservoir pressure. It was observed from micromodel displacement tests that CO2 viscous fingering and breakthrough occurred quickly even at a low pressure of 2.3 MPa, indicating the need to lower the capillary pressure between the heavy oil and porous media and add a mobility buffer between the CO2 and heavy oil. The coreflood results showed that a conventional CO2-WAG process recovered more incremental oil than a flue gas-WAG (9.43 vs. 3.58% OOIP), whereas a CO2-CAG and a flue gas-CAG recovered incremental oil of 27.43 and 22.07% OOIP, respectively. The comprehensive studies suggest that the CO2-CAG process holds promise for recovering Saskatchewan's tremendous heavy oil resources. Keywords: heavy oil recovery, waterflood, ioip, oil recovery, interfacial tension, saturation pressure, viscosity, gas injection method, reservoir temperature, immiscible co 2 Subjects: Improved and Enhanced Recovery, Gas-injection methods, Chemical flooding methods Copyright 2010, Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».