Application of optimization techniques to water quality monitoring designs
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The issues of possible improvements, increased efficiency and/or optimization of monitoring systems in general, and monitoring designs, in particular, attract the attention of researchers for years.Traditionally, these issues are addressed using expert knowledge and heuristic approaches to monitoring system development under the budgetary constraints.Application of formal techniques for these purposes looks appealing since it may validate suggested procedures or justify expenses required for data collection.The paper describes an approach to the development of sampling programs as a solution of the operation research model articulated in terms of the cost-effectiveness analysis.The effectiveness of a sampling program is described through the uncertainty of the estimates obtained from water quality data collected in accordance with the sampling program.Since several water quality indicators, with different temporal and/or spatial variability, are determined from the same water sample, monitoring designs for these indicators must be compromised in a way to ensure a required level of efficiency for all indicators being detected.The proposed approach is based on the operation research model which minimizes the total number of water samples been collected over an investigated period of time under the condition that the uncertainty of an estimate derived from the monitoring data is kept below an acceptable level.The efficient monitoring designs are determined as the solutions of this model.Since concentrations of water constituents exhibit different variability, the numbers of observations required to achieve the same uncertainty level in their estimates vary significantly, even for those water constituents whose concentrations are derived from the same grab water sample.In order to make a practically meaningful recommendation on the frequencies of observations, it is necessary to comprise temporal monitoring designs for all water quality indicators from the same water sample.Given that concentrations of these parameters form under common hydrological and climatic conditions, it is reasonable to assume that series of concentrations are somehow related.It had been shown that if such dependencies are detected, they can be used to significantly reduce the total number of observations required for water quality assessment.The proposed approach has been tested on observation data collected on the Humber River (Ontario, Canada).The major ions, namely, calcium, carbon, magnesium, and potassium have been selected for the study.Since monitoring data can be used for various purposes, simple random designs supporting the evaluation of basic statistics of the investigated water quality indicators are preferable.The relationships between concentrations of the investigated water constituents were described by linear regression models.These models were used in the proposed operation research model to obtain efficient monitoring designs supporting estimation of water quality indicators with a given level of uncertainty.These designs are common for all investigated water quality indicators detected from the same water sample at the Old Mill Road cross-section of the Humber River.The proposed operation research model can be applied to tiered monitoring systems where water quality indicators of interest are split in two sets: core and supplemental, according to their importance for a given site with different accuracy requirements.The designs common for all water quality indicators measured at the given site may result in a higher number of observations.Depending on the desired level of accuracy, it may lead to daily sample collection.The proposed approach may help to develop efficient monitoring designs with the reasonable cost of sampling by considering subsets of the water quality indicators.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,016 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».