Effective Expressions of Agency in a Broad Network of Relationships
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
I argue that while Amartya Sen provides good reasons for focusing on the agency aspect of individuals, his account is too constrained.Sen describes agency in terms of individuals and their capacity for rationality and fails to account for the effect of a broad network of relationships.I turn to Sarah Clark Miller's expanded account of agency to argue that the abilities of relationality and emotionality are also relevant for effective agency.I then argue that Miller's focus on the moral duty to care means that her account is also too individualistic.I ground her account instead in the thoroughly relational nature of agents to show that her account must be coupled with a relational account of autonomy to be adequately sensitive to the effects of oppression on agents.I end by suggesting that oppressed agents can challenge social conditions that are not completely conducive to full autonomy through solidarity.'philosophy' but I heard no such judgment.I think that no matter what I chose to do they would be behind me; they're just those sort of people.It was also very helpful to have v parents (well really, I'm looking at you mom) who worked hard to be financially supportive so I didn't have to worry so much about those things.To Mom: I could not be the independent, intelligent, thesis-writing person I am today without your constant love and support throughout my life.At the end of the day, when it seemed like no one else could totally understand what it is I needed, I went to you.You may not always feel appreciated but please know that you are.When it seems like I don't need you it's only because you did such a good job in the first place.To Dad: I know a lot of who I am comes from you even if sometimes I don't want to believe it.I think it's a lot of the good parts of me too.I know you were there for me in the ways you knew how to be.(And thankfully mom was around for when that wasn't enough!)To Evan: It was always great for my confidence to have someone looking up to me (even if you would never admit it!)I like to think I helped a little bit in you becoming the person you are.I am so proud of you and think so much of our individual success comes from each other.I needed a little brother and I like to think you needed me too.You three have played a crucial role in helping me become the person I am today.I love you.Thank you.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,009 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,024 |
| Communication savante | 0,009 | 0,015 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,010 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».